Skip to content

From Chains to Change: Just Stop Oil Protestors as the New Suffragettes

A suffragette arrested in the street by two police officers in London in 1914
In the vanguard of dissent, demanding justice, a new breed of rebels is rising, and their fight is our fight. Their actions carry the echoes of a movement that stood firm in the face of oppression more than a century ago—the Suffragettes. Today, we draw parallels between these trailblazers and the Just Stop Oil protestors, not to dilute the significance of either struggle but to highlight the enduring power of civil disobedience in the quest for justice.

Unleashing the Power of Protest

The Suffragettes, icons of the early 20th century, battled tirelessly for women’s right to vote, their demands echoing through the corridors of power and disrupting the established order. They used direct action, civil disobedience, and even militancy as tools of protest, refusing to be silenced and refusing to conform. Their struggle was met with scorn, ridicule, and brutality. But their indomitable spirit and their belief in the inherent righteousness of their cause empowered them to endure and ultimately triumph.

They used direct action, civil disobedience, and even militancy as tools of protest, refusing to be silenced and refusing to conform. Their struggle was met with scorn, ridicule, and brutality.

In the same vein, the Just Stop Oil protestors are turning the gears of resistance against the relentless march of ecological destruction. They are the frontline defenders in the battle against a climate catastrophe, demanding an end to fossil fuel dependency and calling for a shift towards sustainable energy solutions. Their tactics, like those of the Suffragettes, may be seen as disruptive, inconvenient, or even radical. But true change has never come from comfort and conformity.

Their tactics, like those of the Suffragettes, may be seen as disruptive, inconvenient, or even radical. But true change has never come from comfort and conformity.

Shaping the Future by Disrupting the Present

Just as the Suffragettes disrupted the status quo in their time, the Just Stop Oil protestors are challenging entrenched power structures today. They are taking a stand against the corporate interests that prioritise profit over the planet and the political elite that turns a blind eye to the impending climate crisis. Their actions are not just about stopping oil; they are about igniting a radical reimagining of our energy future, a future that values life and sustainability over short-term gain.

They are taking a stand against the corporate interests that prioritise profit over the planet and the political elite that turns a blind eye to the impending climate crisis.

The Suffragettes and the Just Stop Oil protestors, though divided by time, are united in their purpose: demanding systemic change and justice. Both are willing to disrupt, to disobey, and to sacrifice personal comfort for the greater good. In the face of oppression and indifference, they choose action, they choose protest, and they choose the path of resistance.

In the face of oppression and indifference, they choose action, they choose protest, and they choose the path of resistance.

The Spirit of Rebellion

The essence of anarchism lies in questioning authority, challenging unjust power structures, and advocating for individual freedom and equality. It’s a spirit embodied by the Suffragettes and echoed by the Just Stop Oil protestors. These are not individuals bent on chaos, but people driven by a profound desire for justice.

To the detractors who question their methods, let’s remember that the Suffragettes were once labelled as criminals and extremists. But history remembers them as heroes and pioneers of change. Today, the Just Stop Oil protestors face similar accusations and prejudices. But they, like the Suffragettes, understand that the struggle for justice often requires disruption, disobedience, and defiance.

To the detractors who question their methods, let’s remember that the Suffragettes were once labelled as criminals and extremists.

As advocates of freedom and justice, we should stand in solidarity with these modern-day warriors. Their fight, after all, is our fight. Their struggle is a struggle for survival, for a sustainable future, and for a world that prioritises people and the planet over profit.

As advocates of freedom and justice, we should stand in solidarity with these modern-day warriors. Their fight, after all, is our fight.

Just as the Suffragettes advanced the cause of women’s rights, the Just Stop Oil protestors are pushing the boundaries of environmental activism. They are, in essence, the new Suffragettes—daring, defiant, and unapologetically disruptive, not for the sake of chaos but for the sake of change.

Just as the Suffragettes advanced the cause of women’s rights, the Just Stop Oil protestors are pushing the boundaries of environmental activism. They are, in essence, the new Suffragettes—daring, defiant, and unapologetically disruptive, not for the sake of chaos but for the sake of change.

Support >> Just Stop Oil

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Artificial Intelligence (9) Book Review (78) Books (82) Britain (35) Capitalism (9) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) diary (11) Donald J Trump (45) Elon Musk (9) Europe (11) Film (11) France (14) History (9) Imperialism (16) Iran (10) Israel (14) Keir Starmer (10) Labour Government (25) Labour Party (9) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (13) Nigel Farage (13) Palestine (9) Protest (14) Reform UK (21) Russia (12) Suella Braverman (8) Television (9) Trade Unionism (8) Ukraine (9) United States of America (85) War (19) Work (9) Working Class (9)

One Response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A vintage revolver mounted on a plain beige wooden wall, evoking the concept of Chekhov’s gun. The weapon is displayed in profile with a dark blued metal frame and a worn wooden grip, lit softly to highlight its aged, utilitarian design.
Alexander Dugin

The Gospel of World War Three: Alexander Dugin and the Death Cult of Civilisation

Alexander Dugin’s latest polemic is not political analysis but fascist sermon—an apocalyptic blueprint in which nuclear war is both inevitable and desirable. Cloaked in the language of sovereignty and tradition, it is a call to arms for a new ideology of holy Russian power. What begins with Fordow ends with the end of humanity. And for that reason alone, it demands scrutiny—not celebration. You listening, tech bros?

Read More »
A square-cropped image featuring the bold black text "THE SAMSON OPTION" in all capital letters on a cream background. The second "O" in "OPTION" is stylised with the upper half containing the Israeli flag and the lower half the American flag, symbolising the book’s geopolitical focus
Iran

The Bomb in the Basement, the Bomb in the Mountains: Israel, Iran, and the Nuclear Hypocrisy of the West

The next state to cross the nuclear threshold won’t be doing anything new. It’ll be following the path Israel already took—building the bomb in secret, shielded by silence and strategic utility. The real precedent was set decades ago in the Negev. That’s the hypocrisy at the heart of the so-called international order: one bomb is a threat to civilisation, the other a pillar of it. This isn’t about non-proliferation. It’s about who gets to own the apocalypse.

Read More »
A stylised, screen-printed poster shows the Spanish PM in a suit walking past large NATO emblems on bold, flat panels. The image is rendered in a 1968 protest aesthetic with a grainy texture and a limited palette of red, navy blue, and beige. The composition evokes vintage political posters, with stark contrast and minimal detail emphasising the symbolism of militarism and conformity.
Donald J Trump

Only Spain Has Got It Right

At The Hague summit, NATO committed to spending 5% of GDP on defence and security by 2035—a figure with no strategic rationale and every sign of submission to Donald Trump. Only Spain said no. Pedro Sánchez broke ranks, arguing that gutting public services to fund rearmament was neither economically justifiable nor politically defensible. In doing so, he exposed what the rest of Europe won’t admit: this isn’t about defence. It’s about deference. And someone had to refuse.

Read More »