Twenty years have elapsed since the US-led invasion of Iraq, and the ghosts of this conflict still linger, haunting the lives of countless individuals. Having just finished reading another article on the conflict, this time a Boston Review article “Iraq Twenty Years Later,” has prompted me to contemplate the humanitarian, economic, and regional consequences of the war, as I unravel the inextricable threads connecting us to this point.

In a previous post on this blog, I explored the underlying forces that shaped the Iraq War, examining the flaws of capitalist imperialism. Building on that analysis, I now want to delve deeper into the lasting impact of the war and the role of this economic and political ideology in driving the events that have left an indelible mark on history.

The Lasting Impact of the Iraq War and the Role of Capitalist Imperialism

The unfathomable humanitarian cost of the war cannot be easily dismissed. With quiet but insistent authority, the numbers are unveiled: the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives, the displacement of millions, and the widespread suffering endured by the civilian population. These figures stand as a testament to the sheer scale of devastation, a haunting reminder of the vulnerability of human life amidst the chaos of war.

Between the whispers of history and the stark reality of the present, the magnitude of lives lost in the Iraq War can be difficult to fathom. According to the data provided by Brown University’s Costs of War project, approximately 208,000 Iraqi civilians had died due to direct war violence since the conflict began in 2003. To put this in perspective, the death toll of the tragic 9/11 attacks, which served as a catalyst for the invasion, was nearly 3,000. This war claimed the lives of more than 69 times the number of people who perished on that fateful September day, forever altering the destinies of countless families and communities in both countries.

As we grapple with these numbers, it becomes apparent that the scale of human suffering in the Iraq War cannot be reduced to mere statistics. Rather, we must strive to understand the individual stories and experiences that lie beneath these figures, and to honour the memories of those who were lost in this devastating conflict. History weaves its intricate tapestry, the threads converge and intertwine, seemingly guided by a preordained, almost fateful pattern. The Iraq War, to some, was always a neoconservative endeavour, a legacy passed down from father to son, George H. W. Bush to George W. Bush. The Bushes, accompanied by Vice President Dick Cheney, and Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld, seemed to be driven by a sense of unfinished business, a desire to reshape the Middle East in accordance with their own vision.

Examining the lasting impact of this conflict, Althusser’s theory of history provides a crucial perspective to understanding the intricate interplay of economic, political, and ideological forces that shaped the conflict. In the case of Iraq, the war was driven by a complex combination of geopolitical aspirations, capitalist interests, and neoconservative ideology. Powerful players, such as the US administration under George W. Bush, pushed for the invasion based on a desire to secure access to resources and establish control over the region, while simultaneously promoting the narrative of a “war on terror” and spreading democracy. By applying Althusser’s framework, we can better grasp how these diverse factors combined to create the conditions for a war that would have profound and far-reaching consequences, shaping not only the Middle East but also the global landscape for decades to come.

It’s important to contemplate the motivations that underlie the path to war, we must consider the ways in which personal convictions (that of the neo-cons) can have profound and enduring effects on the lives of countless individuals, not only non combatants but also the aggressors.

We can now turn our gaze to a singular moment, a specific place, yet it represents countless instances during this conflict, where in the imperceptible instant of an explosion, a cloud of dust, the course of lives is altered irrevocably. In the labyrinthine streets of Fallujah, on April 4, 2004, the First Battle—dubbed Operation Vigilant Resolve—unravelled with unrestrained ferocity, a response to the brutal deaths of four American private military contractors. As the soldiers ventured to regain dominion over the city, a maelstrom of urban warfare engulfed them, the boundary between combatant and non-combatant eroding, dissolving in the haze of conflict. That day, the grim toll of human lives—both American and Iraqi—mounted inexorably, the intricate dance of life and death entwining their fates, as the city drowned in sorrow and devastation.

In the dialectical interplay between individual subjectivities and the grand historical narrative, we are compelled to scrutinise the insidious function of ideology, as it served to perpetuate this conflict, entrenching its legacy and exacting an exorbitant price from the proletariat masses. In the intricate dance of history, as the threads of power and ambition intertwine, it is the fathers and sons, mothers and daughters of the proletarian who bear the weight of these forces. They are the ones who pay the ultimate price, their lives and dreams sacrificed upon the altar of power, silenced by the relentless march of time.

The Unraveling of the Middle East: The Iraq War and the Arab Spring

The neoconservative ideology that underpinned this pursuit sought to promote democracy and American values abroad through the use of military force. In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, the Bush administration and its proponents saw an opportunity to advance their agenda, asserting a connection between Iraq and the threat of terrorism, even in the face of uncertain evidence. This narrative, driven by the impassioned fervour of the moment and the unwavering resolve of those in command, propelled the United States into a war, pulling the submissive U.K. along in its wake. A war that would forever leave a profound and enduring imprint on the world.

In the wake of the war, the Middle East experienced a profound transformation, with the conflict’s reverberations echoing far beyond the borders of Iraq. The war significantly altered the political landscape, weakening the long-standing authoritarian regimes and sowing seeds of discontent among the population. This widespread dissatisfaction and desire for change culminated in the Arab Spring, a series of popular uprisings that swept across the region in 2010 and 2011. Although the causes of the Arab Spring were multifaceted and complex, it is worth considering the role that the Iraq War played in exacerbating existing tensions and undermining the legitimacy of autocratic rulers. By extension, the consequences of the war continue to shape the Middle East and North Africa, as the region grapples with the aftermath of the Arab Spring and the ongoing struggle for democracy, stability, and prosperity.

As the tides of history turn, the voices of Adeed Dawisha and Ed Husain rise, floating on the wings of their respective op-eds, mingling, asserting a link between the Iraq War and the Arab Spring. Dawisha, a professor of political science, pens his thoughts in The New York Times, where he suggests that the democratic winds blowing from Iraq’s 2005 elections planted seeds of change, slowly taking root, eventually flourishing in the popular uprisings of the Arab Spring.

In harmony, Husain, a Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies, shares his insights with CNN’s audience, emphasizing the power of toppling the long-standing dictator Saddam Hussein and the subsequent democratic elections in Iraq. He claims these events inspired a region-wide transformation as the Arab masses glimpsed the possibility of having a say in their governance. The narratives of these two authors, distinct yet intertwined, speak to the echoes of the Iraq War reverberating across the Middle East, shaping the Arab Spring’s landscape.

Economically, the war has cast a long shadow over both the United States and Iraq. Trillions of dollars were spent, a staggering sum that seems to defy comprehension. Yet the true cost lies not only in the numbers, but in the shattered lives and landscapes left in its wake. Iraq’s economy and infrastructure, once brimming with potential, have been left to languish under the weight of this conflict, struggling to regain their footing even as decades slip away.

The invasion of Iraq has reverberated throughout the broader Middle East region, leaving an indelible mark on the geopolitical landscape. Tensions have been exacerbated, the seeds of future conflict sown in the fertile soil of discord. The war has woven a complex and dangerous tapestry, its threads entangling nations and communities, and forever altering the fabric of the region.

As the anniversary of the Iraq War gets closer, retrospective articles serve as a mirror, reflecting not only the decisions that led to the war but also the far-reaching consequences that continue to ripple through time. By engaging in such reflection, we confront the spectres of the past and acknowledge the complexities of the Iraq War. In doing so, we may work towards preventing similar tragedies from unfolding in the future, striving to untangle the knots that have bound us to this turbulent history.

Authoritarianism Books Boris Johnson Campism Capitalism China Class Climate Change Conservative Government Conspiracy Theories COVID-19 Creeping Fascism Crime and Punishment Donald J Trump Economics Film Finance France GB News Imperialism Iraq War Israel Keir Starmer Labour Party Liz Tuss Marxist Theory Media Messing Around Metropolitan Police Migrants Palestine Police Populism Protest Racism Russia Scotland Social Media Suella Braverman The Situationists Trade Unionism United Kingdom United States of America War Working Class

anti capitalist musings