Skip to content

The Inhumanity of Power: Suella Braverman’s Chilling Words and the Drip, Drip of Fear and Hatred

Ai produced painting, called the Morbid Age, dark city scape, 1930s Berlin
Amidst the drip-drip of fear and hatred in our current political climate, Suella Braverman's chilling words serve as a stark reminder of the inhumanity that lies at the heart of power.

Tonight, a line has been crossed. The Tory government has transcended their previous status as the “nasty party” and descended into pure evil. There is now no discernible difference between their incendiary rhetoric and that of the very far-right groups they we have fought to keep out of our communities. This is not merely a matter of semantics, but a dire warning sign of a government that has forsaken any semblance of decency, compassion, or basic morality and has embraced “creeping fascism”.

The words of Suella Braverman, the current Home Secretary, echo with a chilling undertone that harks back to a darker time in our history. The drip, drip of fear and hatred for the other is unmistakable, as she accuses opposition MPs of deceiving the public with their supposed “fake garb of humanitarianism.”

In the face of those who would deny the warning signs of history, I am compelled to speak with the urgency that this moment demands. For those who dismiss any mention of Nazi Germany in the 1930s as ridiculous, I say this: we have entered the morbid age once again, and the echoes of the past are all around us.

The rise of fear and intolerance, the vilification of marginalised communities, and the normalisation of violence are all-too-familiar refrains from a somber era that we must not forget. The lessons of history have taught us that the price of complacency is high, and that the consequences of inaction can be catastrophic.

In her relentless pursuit to stop small boat crossings, Braverman appears to have lost sight of the humanity at stake. Her policy to “stop the boats” at any cost is a stark reminder of a time when the lives of refugees and immigrants were considered expendable. Her callous disregard for the impact of her words and actions on vulnerable human lives is a cause for concern, as is her lack of compassion for those who have endured unimaginable hardships to seek refuge in our country.

Braverman’s words are not those of a compassionate conservative, if such a thing ever existed, but of a politician who along with her party is willing to sacrifice basic human decency for political gain. Her insistence on stopping illegal immigration at any cost, coupled with her dismissal of claims that government policies are bigoted, is a dangerous and irresponsible position to hold.

For in these uncertain times, it is not enough to simply hope for the best. We must work tirelessly to build a better future for ourselves and for those who come after us. We must never forget the lessons of history, for they are our guiding light in the darkness that surrounds us. As Joan Didion once wrote, “we tell ourselves stories in order to live,” but Braverman’s story is one that threatens to undermine the very values that make us human. It is a story that seeks to divide us and sow the seeds of fear and hatred, rather than one that unites us in our common humanity.

3 responses to “The Inhumanity of Power: Suella Braverman’s Chilling Words and the Drip, Drip of Fear and Hatred”

  1. […] failed actions in Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Afghanistan have directly led to the migrant crisis that has gripped the UK in recent years. The goal of these conflicts was to promote democracy and […]

  2. […] were not extinguished; instead, they transformed, adapting to new contexts and circumstances. Nationalism and creeping fascism, a lingering menace, has resurged in Europe, with mainstream right wing parties adopting the […]

  3. […] pledge by the Tories, coupled with the illegal sending of migrants to Rwanda, ominously harks of fascist intent. Embracing a more empathetic approach to migration is not only a reflection of our shared humanity […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Book Review Books Britain Conservative Government Creeping Fascism diary Donald J Trump Europe Film France Imperialism Israel Labour Government Migrants Nigel Farage Protest Reform UK Russia United States of America War

3 responses

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A vintage revolver mounted on a plain beige wooden wall, evoking the concept of Chekhov’s gun. The weapon is displayed in profile with a dark blued metal frame and a worn wooden grip, lit softly to highlight its aged, utilitarian design.
Alexander Dugin

The Gospel of World War Three: Alexander Dugin and the Death Cult of Civilisation

Alexander Dugin’s latest polemic is not political analysis but fascist sermon—an apocalyptic blueprint in which nuclear war is both inevitable and desirable. Cloaked in the language of sovereignty and tradition, it is a call to arms for a new ideology of holy Russian power. What begins with Fordow ends with the end of humanity. And for that reason alone, it demands scrutiny—not celebration. You listening, tech bros?

Read More »
A square-cropped image featuring the bold black text "THE SAMSON OPTION" in all capital letters on a cream background. The second "O" in "OPTION" is stylised with the upper half containing the Israeli flag and the lower half the American flag, symbolising the book’s geopolitical focus
Iran

The Bomb in the Basement, the Bomb in the Mountains: Israel, Iran, and the Nuclear Hypocrisy of the West

The next state to cross the nuclear threshold won’t be doing anything new. It’ll be following the path Israel already took—building the bomb in secret, shielded by silence and strategic utility. The real precedent was set decades ago in the Negev. That’s the hypocrisy at the heart of the so-called international order: one bomb is a threat to civilisation, the other a pillar of it. This isn’t about non-proliferation. It’s about who gets to own the apocalypse.

Read More »
A stylised, screen-printed poster shows the Spanish PM in a suit walking past large NATO emblems on bold, flat panels. The image is rendered in a 1968 protest aesthetic with a grainy texture and a limited palette of red, navy blue, and beige. The composition evokes vintage political posters, with stark contrast and minimal detail emphasising the symbolism of militarism and conformity.
Donald J Trump

Only Spain Has Got It Right

At The Hague summit, NATO committed to spending 5% of GDP on defence and security by 2035—a figure with no strategic rationale and every sign of submission to Donald Trump. Only Spain said no. Pedro Sánchez broke ranks, arguing that gutting public services to fund rearmament was neither economically justifiable nor politically defensible. In doing so, he exposed what the rest of Europe won’t admit: this isn’t about defence. It’s about deference. And someone had to refuse.

Read More »