Starmer’s Middle East speech: A meek bourgeois perspective masks imperialist violence

Keir Starmer talking at Chatham House, snip from X.
In this scathing critique, Simon Pearson eviscerates Labour leader Keir Starmer's recent Chatham House speech on the Israeli action against Hamas, arguing his bourgeois perspective perpetuates imperialist myths and distracts from the radical struggle needed for Palestinian liberation.

Source >> Anti*Capitalist Resistance

Labour leader Keir Starmer recently (Tuesday 31 October 2023) gave a speech on the escalating crisis in the Middle East, commenting on the violence between Israel and Hamas that has led to thousands of deaths. While Starmer, under pressure from the backlash his prior pronouncements have unleashed both within the Labour Party itself and amongst Labour supporters, attempted to strike a more balanced tone, it revealed the limitations of his perspective.

The Israel-Palestine conflict is inherently linked to capitalist imperialism and the contradictory divisions it has created in the region. Starmer sidesteps the core role of Western powers like Britain in establishing Israel through the displacement of Palestinians and supporting that state politically and militarily ever since. There is no acknowledgement of the ongoing oppression of Palestinians under Israeli occupation and apartheid policies. His calls for “pauses” in fighting for humanitarian purposes serve to legitimise Israel’s military assault on Gaza.

Starmer upholds the facade of Israel’s “right to self-defence” while minimising its massively disproportionate use of force and war crimes. He urges Israel to “submit to the rules of international law,” as if mere restraints on state violence could resolve the fundamental injustices at play. He does so while he himself has defended actions that are blatant breaches of the puny rule of international law, such as the cutting of power and water to Gaza.

“Starmer upholds the facade of Israel’s ‘right to self-defence’ while minimising its massively disproportionate use of force and war crimes.”

Marx asserted that the law in bourgeois society inherently serves the ruling class. International laws fall short of achieving Palestinian liberation precisely because they function in a capitalist system where imperialist states like the United States and Britain dominate. The inability of the United Nations to chart a different path was starkly illustrated by the resignation of Craig Mokhiber, director of the New York office of the UN high commissioner for human rights, on November 1, with a powerful denunciation of imperialism’s complicity in genocides and the UN’s powerlessness to prevent it.

Furthermore, Starmer perpetuates the tired liberal myth that the solution lies in a “two-state settlement,” a mirage dangled for decades to distract from Israel’s ongoing settler colonialism. He exhibits the classic bourgeois fixation on diplomacy, negotiations, and incremental reforms instead of naming the underlying structures of oppression and the role of the British state in upholding them.

Any road to justice in the region must involve grassroots struggle against imperialism, capitalism, and all manifestations of racism, including antisemitism and Islamophobia. It requires a struggle to end the occupation and the other subsequent edifices of Israeli apartheid and for the right of return of the 7 million Palestinians living as refugees. It requires solidarity between the Israeli and Palestinian working classes based on their shared interests against economic exploitation.

“His tepid centrism demonstrates that the Labour Party remains captive to capitalist interests despite its socialist roots.”

But Starmer’s speech is confined to platitudes about peace and dialogue within existing power structures. His tepid centrism demonstrates that the Labour Party remains captive to capitalist interests despite its socialist roots. To get past the bourgeois talk and move the fight for human freedom forward, we still need real Marxist ideas like unwavering but critical support for the Palestinian struggle and a push for a one-state solution as part of a radical transformation of the region as a whole.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Artificial Intelligence (10) Book Review (85) Books (89) Britain (53) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) Crime and Punishment (12) diary (11) Donald J Trump (56) Elon Musk (9) Europe (12) European Union (10) Fascism (10) Film (12) France (15) Gaza (14) Immigration (9) Imperialism (22) Iran (10) Israel (17) Keir Starmer (12) Labour Government (36) Labour Party (9) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (16) Nigel Farage (17) Palestine (15) Protest (16) Reform UK (28) Russia (18) Ukraine (10) United States of America (95) War (24) Work (10) Working Class (9)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

Screenshot of a Daily Mail headline by Frank Furedi reading: "We've been silenced on mass migration and the nation's furious. All it will take is one spark and tinderbox Britain will go up in flames: FRANK FUREDI." Below the headline, it notes the article was published at 01:10 on 24 July 2025 and updated at 09:25 the same day. The Mail logo appears at the top left.
Far Right Extremism

Britain Will Not Burn – But Furedi Wants It To

Frank Furedi claims the public has been silenced, while shouting from the pages of the Daily Mail. What he’s really mourning is the loss of uncontested dominance: the fantasy of a Britain where dissent means agreeing with him. This isn’t analysis, it’s a staged panic, designed to justify repression and launder far-right talking points as common sense. Britain isn’t a tinderbox. But pieces like this are trying hard to make it one.

Read More »
In red ink on textured beige paper, a line of riot police with visors and shields confronts an angry crowd. One masked protester is being pulled back mid-leap. The figures are stylised and simplified, with harsh lines and dramatic motion, evoking urgency and confrontation. In the background, blocky lettering hints at a school building.
Britain

The Hotels Are Just the Excuse

The protests outside migrant hotels aren’t spontaneous. They are engineered. Stoked by far-right groups, amplified by the right-wing press, and legitimised by political cowardice, what we’re witnessing is a strategic campaign to turn fear into power. When the police protect anti-racists, it’s called provocation. When the far right throws bottles, it’s “community concern.” The hotels are just the excuse. The real target is the idea that Britain could ever belong to all of us.

Read More »