Skip to content

Starmer’s Middle East speech: A meek bourgeois perspective masks imperialist violence

Keir Starmer talking at Chatham House, snip from X.
In this scathing critique, Simon Pearson eviscerates Labour leader Keir Starmer's recent Chatham House speech on the Israeli action against Hamas, arguing his bourgeois perspective perpetuates imperialist myths and distracts from the radical struggle needed for Palestinian liberation.

Source >> Anti*Capitalist Resistance

Labour leader Keir Starmer recently (Tuesday 31 October 2023) gave a speech on the escalating crisis in the Middle East, commenting on the violence between Israel and Hamas that has led to thousands of deaths. While Starmer, under pressure from the backlash his prior pronouncements have unleashed both within the Labour Party itself and amongst Labour supporters, attempted to strike a more balanced tone, it revealed the limitations of his perspective.

The Israel-Palestine conflict is inherently linked to capitalist imperialism and the contradictory divisions it has created in the region. Starmer sidesteps the core role of Western powers like Britain in establishing Israel through the displacement of Palestinians and supporting that state politically and militarily ever since. There is no acknowledgement of the ongoing oppression of Palestinians under Israeli occupation and apartheid policies. His calls for “pauses” in fighting for humanitarian purposes serve to legitimise Israel’s military assault on Gaza.

Starmer upholds the facade of Israel’s “right to self-defence” while minimising its massively disproportionate use of force and war crimes. He urges Israel to “submit to the rules of international law,” as if mere restraints on state violence could resolve the fundamental injustices at play. He does so while he himself has defended actions that are blatant breaches of the puny rule of international law, such as the cutting of power and water to Gaza.

“Starmer upholds the facade of Israel’s ‘right to self-defence’ while minimising its massively disproportionate use of force and war crimes.”

Marx asserted that the law in bourgeois society inherently serves the ruling class. International laws fall short of achieving Palestinian liberation precisely because they function in a capitalist system where imperialist states like the United States and Britain dominate. The inability of the United Nations to chart a different path was starkly illustrated by the resignation of Craig Mokhiber, director of the New York office of the UN high commissioner for human rights, on November 1, with a powerful denunciation of imperialism’s complicity in genocides and the UN’s powerlessness to prevent it.

Furthermore, Starmer perpetuates the tired liberal myth that the solution lies in a “two-state settlement,” a mirage dangled for decades to distract from Israel’s ongoing settler colonialism. He exhibits the classic bourgeois fixation on diplomacy, negotiations, and incremental reforms instead of naming the underlying structures of oppression and the role of the British state in upholding them.

Any road to justice in the region must involve grassroots struggle against imperialism, capitalism, and all manifestations of racism, including antisemitism and Islamophobia. It requires a struggle to end the occupation and the other subsequent edifices of Israeli apartheid and for the right of return of the 7 million Palestinians living as refugees. It requires solidarity between the Israeli and Palestinian working classes based on their shared interests against economic exploitation.

“His tepid centrism demonstrates that the Labour Party remains captive to capitalist interests despite its socialist roots.”

But Starmer’s speech is confined to platitudes about peace and dialogue within existing power structures. His tepid centrism demonstrates that the Labour Party remains captive to capitalist interests despite its socialist roots. To get past the bourgeois talk and move the fight for human freedom forward, we still need real Marxist ideas like unwavering but critical support for the Palestinian struggle and a push for a one-state solution as part of a radical transformation of the region as a whole.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Artificial Intelligence (9) Book Review (78) Books (82) Britain (35) Capitalism (9) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) diary (11) Donald J Trump (45) Elon Musk (9) Europe (11) Film (11) France (14) History (9) Imperialism (16) Iran (10) Israel (14) Keir Starmer (10) Labour Government (25) Labour Party (9) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (13) Nigel Farage (13) Palestine (9) Protest (14) Reform UK (21) Russia (12) Suella Braverman (8) Television (9) Trade Unionism (8) Ukraine (9) United States of America (85) War (19) Work (9) Working Class (9)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A vintage revolver mounted on a plain beige wooden wall, evoking the concept of Chekhov’s gun. The weapon is displayed in profile with a dark blued metal frame and a worn wooden grip, lit softly to highlight its aged, utilitarian design.
Alexander Dugin

The Gospel of World War Three: Alexander Dugin and the Death Cult of Civilisation

Alexander Dugin’s latest polemic is not political analysis but fascist sermon—an apocalyptic blueprint in which nuclear war is both inevitable and desirable. Cloaked in the language of sovereignty and tradition, it is a call to arms for a new ideology of holy Russian power. What begins with Fordow ends with the end of humanity. And for that reason alone, it demands scrutiny—not celebration. You listening, tech bros?

Read More »
A square-cropped image featuring the bold black text "THE SAMSON OPTION" in all capital letters on a cream background. The second "O" in "OPTION" is stylised with the upper half containing the Israeli flag and the lower half the American flag, symbolising the book’s geopolitical focus
Iran

The Bomb in the Basement, the Bomb in the Mountains: Israel, Iran, and the Nuclear Hypocrisy of the West

The next state to cross the nuclear threshold won’t be doing anything new. It’ll be following the path Israel already took—building the bomb in secret, shielded by silence and strategic utility. The real precedent was set decades ago in the Negev. That’s the hypocrisy at the heart of the so-called international order: one bomb is a threat to civilisation, the other a pillar of it. This isn’t about non-proliferation. It’s about who gets to own the apocalypse.

Read More »
A stylised, screen-printed poster shows the Spanish PM in a suit walking past large NATO emblems on bold, flat panels. The image is rendered in a 1968 protest aesthetic with a grainy texture and a limited palette of red, navy blue, and beige. The composition evokes vintage political posters, with stark contrast and minimal detail emphasising the symbolism of militarism and conformity.
Donald J Trump

Only Spain Has Got It Right

At The Hague summit, NATO committed to spending 5% of GDP on defence and security by 2035—a figure with no strategic rationale and every sign of submission to Donald Trump. Only Spain said no. Pedro Sánchez broke ranks, arguing that gutting public services to fund rearmament was neither economically justifiable nor politically defensible. In doing so, he exposed what the rest of Europe won’t admit: this isn’t about defence. It’s about deference. And someone had to refuse.

Read More »