Skip to content

Trump’s Resurrection of America’s Brutal Legacy

America’s War on Terror may have ended, but its brutal legacy lives on as Trump resurrects its worst excesses, using Guantánamo Bay to detain migrants in a grotesque expansion of the carceral state.

America’s War on Terror may have officially ended, but its brutal legacy has been resurrected by Donald Trump. His return to power is already marked by a grotesque escalation of U.S. immigration policy: the use of Guantánamo Bay to detain migrants. Long associated with torture and indefinite detention, the infamous prison camp is now being repurposed1 to hold up to 30,000 migrants, many of whom are fleeing economic collapse and political turmoil, not committing crimes. Trump will insist these detainees are “criminal aliens.” But early reports suggest most are asylum seekers. The reality? This is not about crime, it’s about control.

Capitalism’s Migrant Scapegoats

The capitalist state thrives on dividing the working class, using migration as a tool to pit workers against each other. Guantánamo allows the U.S. dominant class to criminalise migrants en masse while fuelling xenophobic narratives that shift attention away from the system’s own failures. Locking up migrants does more than instil fear, it suppresses labour. The threat of detention and deportation keeps undocumented workers vulnerable and exploitable, ensuring cheap labour for industries that rely on their precarious status. The U.S. economy needs migrant labour, but capitalists don’t want to grant them rights. The state’s solution? Criminalisation and containment.

Expanding the Carceral State

Using Guantánamo for migrants also feeds the ever-growing U.S. carceral state. It normalises the mass detention of vulnerable populations while expanding the reach of state repression. This isn’t about border security, it’s about state power. If they can do this to migrants, they can do it to anyone deemed a “threat.”

The irony couldn’t be starker. Trump is also looking at outsourcing U.S. prisoners to El Salvador, a country where many migrants are fleeing from gang violence, state repression, and economic collapse. At the same time, he is sending migrants to Guantánamo, a site infamous for U.S. torture, forced confessions, and the legal black hole created to justify human rights abuses. Many of these migrants are escaping precisely the kind of brutality that Guantánamo once represented, only to be locked up in the very same place. The cruelty is deliberate.

The lesson is clear, immigration control isn’t about protecting workers, it’s about protecting profits. Trump’s latest policy is a grim reminder that, under capitalism, borders are weapons wielded by the dominant class to discipline labour. And as long as capital needs a desperate, disposable workforce, the criminalisation of migration will continue. The fight against this brutality isn’t just about migrant rights, it’s about dismantling the entire system that profits from their suffering.


Artificial Intelligence (9) Book Review (78) Books (82) Britain (35) Capitalism (9) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) diary (11) Donald J Trump (45) Elon Musk (9) Europe (11) Film (11) France (14) History (9) Imperialism (16) Iran (10) Israel (14) Keir Starmer (10) Labour Government (25) Labour Party (9) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (13) Nigel Farage (13) Palestine (9) Protest (14) Reform UK (21) Russia (12) Suella Braverman (8) Television (9) Trade Unionism (8) Ukraine (9) United States of America (85) War (19) Work (9) Working Class (9)

  1. and renamed as the Guantanamo Migrant Operations Centre (GMOC)  ↩︎

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A vintage revolver mounted on a plain beige wooden wall, evoking the concept of Chekhov’s gun. The weapon is displayed in profile with a dark blued metal frame and a worn wooden grip, lit softly to highlight its aged, utilitarian design.
Alexander Dugin

The Gospel of World War Three: Alexander Dugin and the Death Cult of Civilisation

Alexander Dugin’s latest polemic is not political analysis but fascist sermon—an apocalyptic blueprint in which nuclear war is both inevitable and desirable. Cloaked in the language of sovereignty and tradition, it is a call to arms for a new ideology of holy Russian power. What begins with Fordow ends with the end of humanity. And for that reason alone, it demands scrutiny—not celebration. You listening, tech bros?

Read More »
A square-cropped image featuring the bold black text "THE SAMSON OPTION" in all capital letters on a cream background. The second "O" in "OPTION" is stylised with the upper half containing the Israeli flag and the lower half the American flag, symbolising the book’s geopolitical focus
Iran

The Bomb in the Basement, the Bomb in the Mountains: Israel, Iran, and the Nuclear Hypocrisy of the West

The next state to cross the nuclear threshold won’t be doing anything new. It’ll be following the path Israel already took—building the bomb in secret, shielded by silence and strategic utility. The real precedent was set decades ago in the Negev. That’s the hypocrisy at the heart of the so-called international order: one bomb is a threat to civilisation, the other a pillar of it. This isn’t about non-proliferation. It’s about who gets to own the apocalypse.

Read More »
A stylised, screen-printed poster shows the Spanish PM in a suit walking past large NATO emblems on bold, flat panels. The image is rendered in a 1968 protest aesthetic with a grainy texture and a limited palette of red, navy blue, and beige. The composition evokes vintage political posters, with stark contrast and minimal detail emphasising the symbolism of militarism and conformity.
Donald J Trump

Only Spain Has Got It Right

At The Hague summit, NATO committed to spending 5% of GDP on defence and security by 2035—a figure with no strategic rationale and every sign of submission to Donald Trump. Only Spain said no. Pedro Sánchez broke ranks, arguing that gutting public services to fund rearmament was neither economically justifiable nor politically defensible. In doing so, he exposed what the rest of Europe won’t admit: this isn’t about defence. It’s about deference. And someone had to refuse.

Read More »