Britain’s Pogrom Logic

A stylised graphic in a 1968 protest-poster aesthetic shows a hooded figure silhouetted in black, arms outstretched, standing before a fiery red and white explosion. The background is highly textured with grainy, distressed effects. In the bottom right, bold red and black block capitals read: “BRITAIN’S POGROM LOGIC.”
The mob lit the match, but it was the right-wing press that soaked the ground and stood back to watch it burn.

The fire that gutted Larne Leisure Centre last night (11 June 2025). A shelter for migrant families fleeing the Ballymena riots. Wasn’t just the act of a dozen hooded men. It was more than tht. It was the end point of a narrative long nurtured by Britain’s right-wing press: a steady drip-feed of suspicion, hostility and dehumanisation. The Daily Mail and the right wing mediascape didn’t throw the Molotov cocktail. It just made sure everyone knew where to aim it.

Screenshot of the Daily Mail Online homepage dated 12 June 2025 with the headline: "'Anti-migrant' tensions come to a head in Northern Ireland as leisure centre sheltering families who fled Ballymena riots is set on fire – while terrified locals put up signs showing their nationality and police battle yobs." Below the headline are six images: a street fire at night; masked individuals vandalising a building; riot police facing protesters with a water cannon; people throwing fireworks at police; a crowd scene; and a close-up of a door displaying a sign with the Filipino flag, a Union Jack, and the message "FILIPINO LIVES HERE."

The Mail’s coverage of the violence is a masterclass in incitement by insinuation. The piece mourns shattered windows and disrupted yoga classes, but still manages to mention—twice—that the accused in an alleged assault “required a Romanian interpreter.” That detail. Irrelevant to the charge—became the matchstick. It was never about justice, only identity. The mob didn’t wait for facts. It saw skin colour. And the press, instead of diffusing the tension, helped crystallise the narrative: that a crime by any migrant is guilt by association for all. A licence to burn homes, terrorise families, and call it community defence.

There’s a sick familiarity to it all. A Czech mother, Blanka Harnagea, pastes a union jack to her window in the hope it will ward off attackers. A Polish man, here fourteen years, surely long enough to call a place home, barricades the front door with a sofa as rioters set his living room on fire. Families tape signs to their homes—“Filipino lives here”—as if pleading not to be chosen. It is the logic of fascism in miniature: the demand to prove allegiance, to assimilate or suffer. And even then, as Ballymena proves, it might not be enough.

This isn’t just about the far-right fringe. Labour is in government now. And what do we get? Mealy-mouthed condemnations. Starmer and his Ministers will “utterly condemn” the violence. Then says nothing of the narrative that enables it. Nothing about the hostile environment that Labour quietly pledges to maintain. Nothing about the hotels Labour MPs called “magnet policies.” Nothing about Rachel Reeves parroting tabloid lines on immigration in Parliament.

They may not speak like Farage, but they govern in his shadow.

And the Mail plays its part. It performs concern, while stoking fear. It packages racist violence as tragedy, never responsibility. The mobs are always “thugs” or “yobs”never citizens shaped by years of anti-migrant scapegoating, years of politicians and newspapers making foreigners the problem. There’s no introspection. No acknowledgment that maybe, just maybe, years of publishing terms like “foreign squatters,” “invasion,” “fighting aged males,” and “unvetted men in hotels” might have had consequences.

You don’t have to throw a petrol bomb to be part of the riot. You just need a printing press and a hatred you’re willing to monetise. And a government too cowardly—or too complicit—to say: this ends now.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

Digital illustration of the International Criminal Court building in The Hague. The image uses a limited palette of teal, turquoise, muted beige, and deep blue. The building’s modern glass facade is simplified into geometric blocks, and the foreground features a bold sign with the ICC’s logo and name in French and English. The overall effect evokes mid-century graphic design, with clean lines, high contrast, and a subdued, politically charged tone.
Gaza

When the Powerful Kill: Why Israel and Russia Get Away with War Crimes

The phrase “rules-based international order” has become a punchline. When Russia bombs a maternity hospital, it’s a war crime. When Israel flattens a refugee camp, it’s self-defence. The ICC pursues African warlords and Balkan generals with zeal—but stalls or retreats when the accused are allies of Washington or clients of London. The problem isn’t that international law exists. It’s that it doesn’t apply to everyone. War crimes are prosecuted not on the basis of what’s done, but who does it, and who they do it for.

Read More »
Graphic in distressed orange, black, and olive green. The image shows ruined buildings silhouetted against a stark sky, with jagged barbed wire stretching across the foreground. The word “GAZA” appears in large, block letters at the top, evoking a sense of confinement, devastation, and resistance.
Ethnic Cleansing

This Is Ethnic Cleansing—Call It What It Is

Behind the talk of “humanitarian cities” and postwar development lies a brutal truth: this is a plan to herd Palestinians into ghettos, fence them in, and call it aid. When Blair’s thinktank is on calls about a “Trump Riviera” in Gaza, you know the project isn’t reconstruction—it’s removal.

Read More »
A grainy, vintage-style image depicting a dense urban skyline with mid-rise buildings. A large, dark plume of smoke rises ominously from the city centre, suggesting a recent explosion. The image is rendered in a washed-out, sepia-orange tone, evoking a 1968 protest poster aesthetic with high contrast and nostalgic texture. A mosque minaret is visible among the buildings, hinting at the city's Middle Eastern setting.
Book Review

A Requiem for Human Rights

What separates Hedges’s account from the usual war reporting is his refusal to speak in the language of balance. There are no “both sides” here. Gaza is not a tragedy. It is a crime. And history, in his telling, is not analogy but repetition. The Nakba never ended. The airstrikes are new; the logic is old. “We progress backwards,” someone has scrawled on a UN school wall. That line could be the book’s thesis.

Read More »