But let’s be clear: Blue Labour is a malign influence, a reactionary force that panders to those who should be nowhere near a socialist party. It does not offer a vision of renewal but a retreat into nationalism, social conservatism, and nostalgia, a politics that is fundamentally at odds with the needs of the working class. Founded by Maurice Glasman in 2009, Blue Labour emerged as a supposed antidote to the failures of New Labour. It claimed to reject both Blairite technocracy and the liberal-left’s cosmopolitanism (metropolitanism?) in favour of a politics rooted in a faith, flag, and family. Yet, beneath the rhetoric of community and belonging lies an unmistakable accommodation with reactionary ideas: a hostility to immigration, a moral panic about the (far) left, and an insistence that Labour must appeal to a socially conservative, nationalist electorate. Rather than confronting the forces of capital that exploit and divide working-class communities, Blue Labour’s politics shift the blame elsewhere. Its solution to Labour’s Reform UK threat is not economic radicalism but cultural retreat, insisting that the real problem is that the party is too “woke” too internationalist, too concerned with minority rights. It is a form of defeatism masquerading as strategy, one that concedes the right’s framing of every major political issue.
“Blue Labour’s politics shift the blame elsewhere. Its solution to Labour’s struggles is not economic radicalism but cultural retreat.”
It should be no surprise that at a time of Trump 2.0, and the threat of Nigel Farage, we see Blue Labour (small but growing number) once again being mentioned in Labour circles. Just as the far-right surges internationally, figures within Labour seek to shift the party towards nationalism and cultural conservatism, believing they can win over disillusioned voters by mimicking (see the recent media messaging on immigration raids) reactionary politics. The lessons from Trump’s resurgence like those from the far right riots last year in Britain and the rise of the politics of hate across Europe are clear: capitulating to these forces does not neutralise them, it only legitimises their rhetoric. Blue Labour’s return seems to be part of this broader political realignment, where sections of the political class respond to the rise of far right nationalism not by strongly opposing it, but by adapting to it. When will they learn? Centrism can’t hold the line against fascism.
The Wrong Audience
Blue Labour insists that Labour must listen to voters who have drifted to the right. In practice, this means validating reactionary anxieties rather than challenging them. This is the politics of appeasement, and it has been tried before. It failed under Ed Miliband, who flirted with Blue Labour themes while being outflanked by UKIP and the Tories. It failed under Keir Starmer’s early attempts to wrap himself in the Union Jack. And it will fail again. The argument that Labour must embrace nationalism, be tougher on crime, or tone down its social liberalism is indistinguishable from those on the right. The logic is always the same: shift the party further rightward in a futile attempt to win over a section of the electorate that will never be satisfied with your politics, all while alienating the younger, diverse, and more left wing (eco-socialist) working-class base that Labour actually needs to mobilise.
“Rather than offering a vision of socialist transformation, Blue Labour urges Labour to compete on Reform UK terrain an approach that has failed every time it has been attempted.”
The Hollow Promise
One of Blue Labour’s more insidious tricks is its claim to oppose neoliberalism. It speaks of the dignity of labour and the importance of local economies, but its economic vision is vague and sentimental, offering little in the way of concrete policies that would challenge capitalist power. At a time when Labour should be advocating more public ownership, wealth redistribution, taxing the rich and more worker control, Blue Labour offers only a nostalgic vision of small-scale mutualism. This is not a programme for economic transformation; it is a retreat into fantasy. Worse still, it directs working-class anger away from the true sources of exploitation and towards easy scapegoat’s whether that be immigrants, social liberals, the left, or metropolitan elites.
“At a time when Labour should be advancing a bold, transformative economic vision, Blue Labour offers only nostalgia and concession.”
Dead End for Labour
Blue Labour is not a path to victory. It is an ideological dead end that weakens the left and emboldens the far right. Labour’s future does not lie in appeasing reactionary forces but in mobilising the working class around a clear, radical vision of economic and social justice. Blue Labour offers no such vision only a regressive politics dressed in the language of tradition.
The only thing Blue Labour will achieve if allowed to fester unchallenged will be Prime Minister Farage and a Reform UK government at the next election. This is the Morrissey effect, a reactionary politics draped in the Union Jack, masquerading as a defence of working-class identity while doing nothing to attack the forces that actually oppress it.
Artificial Intelligence (9) Book Review (78) Books (82) Britain (35) Capitalism (9) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) diary (11) Donald J Trump (45) Elon Musk (9) Europe (11) Film (11) France (14) History (9) Imperialism (16) Iran (10) Israel (14) Keir Starmer (10) Labour Government (25) Labour Party (9) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (13) Nigel Farage (13) Palestine (9) Protest (14) Reform UK (21) Russia (12) Suella Braverman (8) Television (9) Trade Unionism (8) Ukraine (9) United States of America (85) War (19) Work (9) Working Class (9)
