Skip to content

Britain Does Not Need a Labour Shortage

Richard Tice imgae imagined
Britain doesn’t need a labour shortage to punish the poor.

Richard Tice, deputy leader of Reform UK and Nigel Farage’s favourite understudy, has said the quiet part out loud: he wants Britain to have a labour shortage. Not to fix the economy, not to raise wages, but to punish the poor and force a new round of productivity through desperation. It’s the politics of the boot. The idea that if you just squeeze people hard enough, something efficient and profitable will pop out the other end. It’s not good economics. It’s sadism.

Tice is arguing against an EU-UK youth mobility scheme that would allow reciprocal work rights for young people. British and European alike. His justification? That Britain needs fewer workers, not more. A tight labour market, he claims, will scare bosses into investing and scare workers into compliance. Fewer workers will mean better work. Less freedom will mean more productivity. It’s the same Thatcherite logic that brought us mass unemployment and zero-hour contracts, dressed up now in Brexit bunting.

Let’s be clear: labour shortages do not create productivity booms. Investment does. Planning does. Coordination does. All the things the likes of Tice and Farage have spent their careers dismantling. British productivity has flatlined not because there are too many young Europeans pulling pints, but because our economy is now built around rent-seeking, asset bubbles, and managerial bloat. Try finding a train that runs on time, a functioning GP surgery, or a company that pays to train its staff. We don’t have too many workers. We have too few decent jobs, and too many people hoarding capital.

Meanwhile, the sectors most reliant on labour, care, the NHS, logistics, food, are already stretched to breaking point. Shortages don’t mean bosses suddenly become generous. They mean hospitals without staff, crops left to rot, care homes where residents are neglected. This isn’t a plan. It’s a managed collapse sold as tough love. And it’s not helped by a Labour government desperately trying to look and act tougher on migration than Reform, mimicking the language of border control and deterrence while abandoning any pretence of solidarity with the workers who keep the country running.

But there’s something darker underneath Tice’s vision. He talks about labour shortages as a cleansing fire, something that will purge the country of “welfare dependency”. It’s the old lie that there’s plenty of work if people just get off their arses. That poverty is personal failure. That the problem with Britain isn’t a system rigged for landlords and hedge funds, but the laziness of the working class. It’s the politics of resentment, aimed downwards, never up.

And when Tice sneers at youth mobility, what he’s really attacking is freedom. The right to live, work, and build a life beyond the narrow borders of a post-Brexit Britain. It’s not migration he hates, it’s solidarity. The idea that young people from Bradford or Bologna might share something in common beyond his little flag-waving bunker.

Britain does not need a labour shortage. It needs a strong labour movement. One that fights for higher wages through organisation, not attrition. One that demands investment, not immiseration. One that sees solidarity as an answer to crisis, not scapegoating.

Tice and his ilk want you to believe that scarcity is strength, that restriction is freedom, that cutting off your nose will somehow make you breathe better. It’s the politics of decline, spoken in the clipped vowels of Little England. Don’t fall for it.

We don’t need fewer workers. We need fewer Tories in disguise.


Artificial Intelligence (9) Book Review (84) Books (88) Britain (40) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) diary (11) Donald J Trump (47) Elon Musk (9) Europe (11) Film (12) France (14) Gaza (10) Imperialism (19) Iran (10) Israel (15) Keir Starmer (11) Labour Government (32) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (13) Nigel Farage (13) Palestine (11) Protest (14) Reform UK (22) Russia (14) Television (9) United States of America (88) War (23) Work (9) Working Class (9)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A grainy, vintage-style image depicting a dense urban skyline with mid-rise buildings. A large, dark plume of smoke rises ominously from the city centre, suggesting a recent explosion. The image is rendered in a washed-out, sepia-orange tone, evoking a 1968 protest poster aesthetic with high contrast and nostalgic texture. A mosque minaret is visible among the buildings, hinting at the city's Middle Eastern setting.
Book Review

A Requiem for Human Rights

What separates Hedges’s account from the usual war reporting is his refusal to speak in the language of balance. There are no “both sides” here. Gaza is not a tragedy. It is a crime. And history, in his telling, is not analogy but repetition. The Nakba never ended. The airstrikes are new; the logic is old. “We progress backwards,” someone has scrawled on a UN school wall. That line could be the book’s thesis.

Read More »
A vintage-style protest poster rendered in grainy halftone with a jaundiced beige and olive green palette. The image shows British soldiers in uniform, in a casual moment during a military inspection. Bold black text beneath reads: “SMILE FOR THE CROWN WHILE YOU OCCUPY THE STREETS.” The design evokes 1968 protest aesthetics with a stark critique of military presence and royal authority.
Imperialism

Who Is the Violence For?

This month, the British state made its position on violence unambiguous: while ex-generals and loyal newspapers led the charge, Parliament followed. The result was clear: Impunity for its own, criminalisation for its critics. In the same month it moved to quash investigations into war crimes in Northern Ireland, it voted to proscribe Palestine Action under terrorism law.

Read More »
A digital illustration features portraits of Donald Trump and Alexander Dugin side by side, rendered in bold red, orange, and black tones. Trump appears stern in a suit and tie, his expression tense, with an American flag pin on his lapel. Dugin gazes forward with a solemn intensity, his thick beard and unkempt hair highlighted by radiating orange rays behind his head, evoking a dark, iconographic halo. The background is a deep red gradient, reinforcing the dramatic and ideological tone of the piece.
Alexander Dugin

Trump, Dugin, and the Eschatology of Reaction

Trump is no longer a politician in Dugin’s hands. He is a prophet who fell short. But the prophecy lives on. That’s how Dugin works: he turns failure into myth, betrayal into destiny. Putinism becomes the sacred, Trumpism the fallen. Everything is wrapped in theology, because the politics (when you look closely) aren’t up to much. It’s not tradition he’s defending. It’s accelerationism with a whiff of incense.

Read More »
Imperialism

No One Is Above the Law—Not Even the SAS

The state demands loyalty from its killers, and contempt for those who ask why. To question the SAS is treated as heresy. To investigate them, as betrayal. But no one is above the law. Not even the men with night-vision goggles and state-sanctioned impunity. If the victims of British state violence are to be denied justice so that the myth of military virtue can remain intact, then we are not a democracy. We continue to be an empire that refuses to admit it.

Read More »