Skip to content

Tory Email Accusing Civil Servants of Obstructing Government Policy Sparks Outrage

Conservative party email accusing civil servants of obstructing policy exposes class conflict and authoritarian agenda.

The recent email purportedly written by Suella Braverman (and sent out by CCHQ), accusing left-wing lawyers, civil servants, and the Labour Party of obstructing government policy, has prompted outrage and exposed the Conservative Party’s willingness to scapegoat civil servants to distract from their failures. Dave Penman, general secretary of the FDA, stated that the attack on civil servants is a direct affront to their integrity and impartiality, and is a violation of the ministerial code that requires ministers to uphold the political impartiality of the civil service. The fact that officials working in the Home Office have been told to take precautions to protect their security is a testament to the potential risk this attack poses to public servants. This situation highlights the class conflict inherent in the Conservative Party’s authoritarian agenda, which seeks to divide and conquer by demonising public servants.

I would refute the suggestion that the email attack on civil servants may not have been approved by Braverman. Regardless of whether Braverman personally approved the email, it was sent out in her name and thus bears her responsibility. Furthermore, this attempt to distance Braverman from the email does not absolve her of the responsibility to uphold the political impartiality of the civil service. Additionally, the fact that Braverman criticised government lawyers for being overly cautious about approving policies likely to face legal challenge highlights the Conservative Party’s disregard for the rule of law and demonstrates their willingness to prioritise their political agenda over the public interest.

Furthermore, this attempt to distance Braverman from the email does not absolve her of the responsibility to uphold the political impartiality of the civil service.

Artificial Intelligence Book Review Books Britain Capitalism China Class Climate Change Conservative Government Conspiracy Theories Creeping Fascism Crime and Punishment diary Donald J Trump Economics Elon Musk Europe Fascism Film France Gaza History Imperialism Iran Israel Keir Starmer Labour Government Labour Party Marxist Theory Migrants Nigel Farage Palestine Protest Reform UK Russia Suella Braverman tarrifs Television Trade Unionism Ukraine United States of America Verso Books War Work Working Class

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A vintage revolver mounted on a plain beige wooden wall, evoking the concept of Chekhov’s gun. The weapon is displayed in profile with a dark blued metal frame and a worn wooden grip, lit softly to highlight its aged, utilitarian design.
Alexander Dugin

The Gospel of World War Three: Alexander Dugin and the Death Cult of Civilisation

Alexander Dugin’s latest polemic is not political analysis but fascist sermon—an apocalyptic blueprint in which nuclear war is both inevitable and desirable. Cloaked in the language of sovereignty and tradition, it is a call to arms for a new ideology of holy Russian power. What begins with Fordow ends with the end of humanity. And for that reason alone, it demands scrutiny—not celebration. You listening, tech bros?

Read More »
A square-cropped image featuring the bold black text "THE SAMSON OPTION" in all capital letters on a cream background. The second "O" in "OPTION" is stylised with the upper half containing the Israeli flag and the lower half the American flag, symbolising the book’s geopolitical focus
Iran

The Bomb in the Basement, the Bomb in the Mountains: Israel, Iran, and the Nuclear Hypocrisy of the West

The next state to cross the nuclear threshold won’t be doing anything new. It’ll be following the path Israel already took—building the bomb in secret, shielded by silence and strategic utility. The real precedent was set decades ago in the Negev. That’s the hypocrisy at the heart of the so-called international order: one bomb is a threat to civilisation, the other a pillar of it. This isn’t about non-proliferation. It’s about who gets to own the apocalypse.

Read More »
A stylised, screen-printed poster shows the Spanish PM in a suit walking past large NATO emblems on bold, flat panels. The image is rendered in a 1968 protest aesthetic with a grainy texture and a limited palette of red, navy blue, and beige. The composition evokes vintage political posters, with stark contrast and minimal detail emphasising the symbolism of militarism and conformity.
Donald J Trump

Only Spain Has Got It Right

At The Hague summit, NATO committed to spending 5% of GDP on defence and security by 2035—a figure with no strategic rationale and every sign of submission to Donald Trump. Only Spain said no. Pedro Sánchez broke ranks, arguing that gutting public services to fund rearmament was neither economically justifiable nor politically defensible. In doing so, he exposed what the rest of Europe won’t admit: this isn’t about defence. It’s about deference. And someone had to refuse.

Read More »