Skip to content
Fractured by the Feed painting
Behind the convenient façade of connectivity, online life fractures shared meaning and hijacks lived experience into a hyperreal dataspace optimised for extraction, prediction, and control. Fragmented perspectives oscillate desperately between terminals struggling to capture scarce attention now more valuable than ever.

Where once life was directly lived, now even the most intimate experiences are filtered through the mediation of pixels, commodified, and packaged for flitting consumption. The stream of content and notifications crowds out direct engagement with the world, replacing reality with representation. Every cuisine, landscape, and culture become mere fodder for the insatiable mirror of liquid crystal displays.

The surge of algorithmically boosted viral media merges perspectives into a single overwhelming flood travelling at fiber-optic speeds. All nuance and context washes away before the torrent of surface-level takes and manipulative misinformation proliferating through networks. Fragmentary hot takes regroup into polarised echo chambers that merely reflect and amplify pre-existing biases between terminals that are no longer mutually recognisable.

The online world becomes hyperreal, more real than reality itself—its simulation hijacks even lived experience. Physical encounters are crowded out by virtual pseudo-communities, digital pseudo-events, and trending pseudo-crises. Eyes remain locked on screens, guiding bodies absently through streets and spaces long rendered unfamiliar by the dissolution of common symbolic meaning.

“The online world becomes hyperreal, more real than reality itself—its simulation hijacks even lived experience.”

Behind the feed’s façade of convenience and connectivity, new forms of disorientation, dependency, and control solidify. Users grow fractured and deskilled, colonised by compulsions engineered to benefit unseen actors and interests. Daily experience becomes filled with anxieties urgently communicated about catastrophes unfolding in unknown realms mysteriously excluded from lived perceptions.

“Behind the feed’s façade of convenience and connectivity, new forms of disorientation, dependency, and control solidify.”

Between outbursts of spectacular violence and manufactured conflict, endless total information about everything gives way to endless total confusion about anything. Paralysed spectators reduced to detachment oscillate from screen to screen, their attention scarcer and more valuable than ever, desperately sought by platforms competing ruthlessly to dominate behavioural futures markets through data extraction, predictive analytics, and algorithmic control.

“Between outbursts of spectacular violence and manufactured conflict, endless total information about everything gives way to endless total confusion about anything.”


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Artificial Intelligence (9) Book Review (78) Books (82) Britain (35) Capitalism (9) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) diary (11) Donald J Trump (45) Elon Musk (9) Europe (11) Film (11) France (14) History (9) Imperialism (16) Iran (10) Israel (14) Keir Starmer (10) Labour Government (25) Labour Party (9) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (13) Nigel Farage (13) Palestine (9) Protest (14) Reform UK (21) Russia (12) Suella Braverman (8) Television (9) Trade Unionism (8) Ukraine (9) United States of America (85) War (19) Work (9) Working Class (9)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A vintage revolver mounted on a plain beige wooden wall, evoking the concept of Chekhov’s gun. The weapon is displayed in profile with a dark blued metal frame and a worn wooden grip, lit softly to highlight its aged, utilitarian design.
Alexander Dugin

The Gospel of World War Three: Alexander Dugin and the Death Cult of Civilisation

Alexander Dugin’s latest polemic is not political analysis but fascist sermon—an apocalyptic blueprint in which nuclear war is both inevitable and desirable. Cloaked in the language of sovereignty and tradition, it is a call to arms for a new ideology of holy Russian power. What begins with Fordow ends with the end of humanity. And for that reason alone, it demands scrutiny—not celebration. You listening, tech bros?

Read More »
A square-cropped image featuring the bold black text "THE SAMSON OPTION" in all capital letters on a cream background. The second "O" in "OPTION" is stylised with the upper half containing the Israeli flag and the lower half the American flag, symbolising the book’s geopolitical focus
Iran

The Bomb in the Basement, the Bomb in the Mountains: Israel, Iran, and the Nuclear Hypocrisy of the West

The next state to cross the nuclear threshold won’t be doing anything new. It’ll be following the path Israel already took—building the bomb in secret, shielded by silence and strategic utility. The real precedent was set decades ago in the Negev. That’s the hypocrisy at the heart of the so-called international order: one bomb is a threat to civilisation, the other a pillar of it. This isn’t about non-proliferation. It’s about who gets to own the apocalypse.

Read More »
A stylised, screen-printed poster shows the Spanish PM in a suit walking past large NATO emblems on bold, flat panels. The image is rendered in a 1968 protest aesthetic with a grainy texture and a limited palette of red, navy blue, and beige. The composition evokes vintage political posters, with stark contrast and minimal detail emphasising the symbolism of militarism and conformity.
Donald J Trump

Only Spain Has Got It Right

At The Hague summit, NATO committed to spending 5% of GDP on defence and security by 2035—a figure with no strategic rationale and every sign of submission to Donald Trump. Only Spain said no. Pedro Sánchez broke ranks, arguing that gutting public services to fund rearmament was neither economically justifiable nor politically defensible. In doing so, he exposed what the rest of Europe won’t admit: this isn’t about defence. It’s about deference. And someone had to refuse.

Read More »