Austerity and Missiles

As Putin wages a war without end, Britain prepares for conflict in the only way it knows how, by cutting everything except the military.

The overnight assault was one of the heaviest in months. Ukrainian air defence intercepted 72 drones, but more than 70 struck their targets, energy facilities, homes, the familiar pattern of Putin’s war. Striking civilian infrastructure. Alongside them came Iskander-M ballistic missiles and S-300s, repurposed from their original air defence role into crude bombardment weapons. It followed another round of speculation about ceasefires, about a deal that might satisfy all parties. But Putin has no interest in compromise. Every supposed pause is merely preparation for the next offensive. His war economy is set to sustain this conflict indefinitely.

In Britain, where the war is fought at the level of budget lines, Rachel Reeves is finalising her Spring Statement. Defence spending is going up to 2.5% of GDP by 2027, with an eventual target of 3% but the means of funding it are familiar. The international aid budget will shrink again. Tax thresholds will stay frozen, dragging more people into higher bands. Cuts to public services are expected, though the details remain vague. A new “patriot tax” has been floated, though no one has yet dared to commit to it. Austerity, rebranded.

This is not rearmament as it was once understood. The last time Britain set itself to military expansion, it was with a state that could plan, build, and sustain both an army and a welfare state. The Cold War balance—guns, butter, nuclear submarines and council houses—has been broken. There will be weapons, but no real industrial policy, no strategic economy, no investment in the state’s capacity beyond its ability to wage war.

Putin is watching. He sees a Britain that still expects the market to provide, that assumes weapons can be bought when needed, that economic resilience is an expensive distraction. He knows how this ends. If Western governments continue in this direction, if they insist on funding war through domestic decline, he can wait. Eventually, the money will run out.


Artificial Intelligence (10) Book Review (85) Books (89) Britain (54) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) Crime and Punishment (12) diary (11) Donald J Trump (57) Europe (12) European Union (10) Film (12) France (15) Gaza (15) Imperialism (22) Iran (10) Israel (18) Keir Starmer (12) Labour Government (36) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (16) Nigel Farage (17) Palestine (15) Protest (16) Reform UK (28) Russia (19) Ukraine (10) United States of America (95) War (25) Work (10)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

Britain

From “Feed the World” to Looking Away

Live Aid was forty years ago. Today, we are haunted once again by the images of starving children (and now, starving adults) in Gaza. But this time, it doesn’t seem to register. No concerts. No campaigns. No national reckoning. Why? Because the system can only process suffering when it’s stripped of politics. Ethiopia’s famine was framed as fate. Gaza’s is a siege, and Britain is complicit. That’s the difference.

Read More »
Screenshot of a Daily Mail headline by Frank Furedi reading: "We've been silenced on mass migration and the nation's furious. All it will take is one spark and tinderbox Britain will go up in flames: FRANK FUREDI." Below the headline, it notes the article was published at 01:10 on 24 July 2025 and updated at 09:25 the same day. The Mail logo appears at the top left.
Far Right Extremism

Britain Will Not Burn – But Furedi Wants It To

Frank Furedi claims the public has been silenced, while shouting from the pages of the Daily Mail. What he’s really mourning is the loss of uncontested dominance: the fantasy of a Britain where dissent means agreeing with him. This isn’t analysis, it’s a staged panic, designed to justify repression and launder far-right talking points as common sense. Britain isn’t a tinderbox. But pieces like this are trying hard to make it one.

Read More »