Skip to content

No Elections, No Problem

Image of Donald J Trump from White House website
Trump’s second presidency isn’t just an assault on democracy; it’s the moment the dominant class decided elections were no longer necessary.

Trump doesn’t care about the polls. Why would he? Polls only matter if you hold elections. And what if you don’t? The great liberal delusion, that democracy is inevitable, that institutions self-correct, that the system will somehow save itself, has now collapsed under the weight of its own contradictions. Trump’s second presidency isn’t just an assault on democracy; it’s the confirmation that, for the dominant class, democracy is no longer necessary.

The signs were there from the start. His supporters cheered when he said he’d only be a dictator “on day one.” They knew better. From the purges of the civil service under DOGE and Project 2025 to the promise of mass internments under the Alien Enemies Act, the agenda has been clear: state power in service of capital, without the inconvenience of public consent. Elections were tolerated as long as they delivered the right results. Now that they threaten the order of things, they can be ignored, repressed, or, failing that, rigged.

This is not a personalist dictatorship, nor a coup in the classical sense. The old model, one man seizing power, abolishing elections, declaring himself ruler for life, has been replaced by something far more insidious. Trump doesn’t need to dissolve Congress; he just needs to render it irrelevant. He doesn’t need to ban elections; he only needs to ensure they no longer matter. The judiciary, once a minor obstacle, has been reshaped to his will. State legislatures, primed for decades by voter suppression laws, will do their part. The infrastructure of American democracy is being gutted from within.

And who, exactly, will stop this? The Democrats, paralysed by nostalgia for a system that no longer functions? The courts, stacked with Federalist Society ideologues who see in Trump the perfect vehicle for their counter-revolution? The press, locked in its cycle of outrage and amnesia, always a step behind?

The truth is, Trump is not the cause but the symptom. The American dominant class has long since lost faith in democracy as a means of governing. It was always a tool, an instrument for managing class antagonism while maintaining order. The façade was tolerated when it was useful. But now? Now, they have a more efficient model: a state that serves capital directly, without the hassle of popular legitimacy.

The only question left is how long the pretence lasts. There will still be elections, of course. But elections are only a problem if they’re capable of removing those in power. When they no longer serve that function, when they become, as in Russia, as in Hungary, as in Turkey, merely decorative, the illusion of choice remains, but the result is never in doubt. Trump doesn’t need to cancel the next election. He just needs to ensure that, when it comes, it won’t matter.


Artificial Intelligence (9) Book Review (78) Books (82) Britain (35) Capitalism (9) Climate Change (8) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) Crime and Punishment (8) diary (11) Donald J Trump (45) Elon Musk (9) Europe (11) Film (11) France (14) History (9) Imperialism (16) Iran (10) Israel (14) Keir Starmer (10) Labour Government (25) Labour Party (9) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (13) Nigel Farage (13) Palestine (9) Protest (14) Reform UK (21) Russia (12) Suella Braverman (8) Television (9) Trade Unionism (8) Ukraine (9) United States of America (85) War (19) Work (9) Working Class (9)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A vintage revolver mounted on a plain beige wooden wall, evoking the concept of Chekhov’s gun. The weapon is displayed in profile with a dark blued metal frame and a worn wooden grip, lit softly to highlight its aged, utilitarian design.
Alexander Dugin

The Gospel of World War Three: Alexander Dugin and the Death Cult of Civilisation

Alexander Dugin’s latest polemic is not political analysis but fascist sermon—an apocalyptic blueprint in which nuclear war is both inevitable and desirable. Cloaked in the language of sovereignty and tradition, it is a call to arms for a new ideology of holy Russian power. What begins with Fordow ends with the end of humanity. And for that reason alone, it demands scrutiny—not celebration. You listening, tech bros?

Read More »
A square-cropped image featuring the bold black text "THE SAMSON OPTION" in all capital letters on a cream background. The second "O" in "OPTION" is stylised with the upper half containing the Israeli flag and the lower half the American flag, symbolising the book’s geopolitical focus
Iran

The Bomb in the Basement, the Bomb in the Mountains: Israel, Iran, and the Nuclear Hypocrisy of the West

The next state to cross the nuclear threshold won’t be doing anything new. It’ll be following the path Israel already took—building the bomb in secret, shielded by silence and strategic utility. The real precedent was set decades ago in the Negev. That’s the hypocrisy at the heart of the so-called international order: one bomb is a threat to civilisation, the other a pillar of it. This isn’t about non-proliferation. It’s about who gets to own the apocalypse.

Read More »
A stylised, screen-printed poster shows the Spanish PM in a suit walking past large NATO emblems on bold, flat panels. The image is rendered in a 1968 protest aesthetic with a grainy texture and a limited palette of red, navy blue, and beige. The composition evokes vintage political posters, with stark contrast and minimal detail emphasising the symbolism of militarism and conformity.
Donald J Trump

Only Spain Has Got It Right

At The Hague summit, NATO committed to spending 5% of GDP on defence and security by 2035—a figure with no strategic rationale and every sign of submission to Donald Trump. Only Spain said no. Pedro Sánchez broke ranks, arguing that gutting public services to fund rearmament was neither economically justifiable nor politically defensible. In doing so, he exposed what the rest of Europe won’t admit: this isn’t about defence. It’s about deference. And someone had to refuse.

Read More »