Skip to content

Farage: The Enemy Within

A Union Jack ballot box in which a hand is placing a voting card inside - below it says "Don't be fooled again"
Some might be fooled by the swivel-eyed sermons about “free speech” or “common sense.” But Farage is no friend of workers. His party would criminalise strikes, deregulate labour protections, and deport those without paperwork faster than you can say “hostile environment.” The deeper appeal comes not from anything tangible, but from the thrill of performative cruelty.

As local elections approach in May, the siren call of Nigel Farage’s Reform UK grows louder, promising rebellion to the disillusioned and angry. But scratch beneath the pint-swilling, pub-chat persona, and there’s something far darker at play. This isn’t protest; it’s a hostile takeover.

Picture Farage behind closed doors with Donald Trump, the figurehead of transatlantic fascism. This isn’t idle speculation. Farage proudly boasts of their friendship. When the cameras aren’t rolling, their conversations are not about championing the working class but exploiting it. It’s cynical, calculating, dangerous. Power, pure and simple.

To the fossil fuel executives pumping money into Reform UK, Farage’s whispers are reassuringly direct. Forget climate commitments, net-zero nonsense. The environmental regulations he mocks publicly are precisely what he privately pledges to dismantle. Communities poisoned? Homes flooded? Collateral damage for bigger profits. And he knows exactly who will suffer most and it’s not the people funding his party.

Then there’s the bosses. Farage sells them dreams of deregulation, low wages, and obedient labour. Thatcher’s ghost haunts his every promise—flexible workers, stripped of union protections, easily discarded. He is no friend to working people. He’s management’s muscle, ready to enforce discipline through precarity and poverty.

Some might be fooled by the swivel-eyed sermons about “free speech” or “common sense.” But Farage is no friend of workers. His party would criminalise strikes, deregulate labour protections, and deport those without paperwork faster than you can say “hostile environment.” The flirtation with trade unions is theatre – a pantomime handshake followed by a P45.

The deeper appeal, such as it is, comes not from anything tangible in Reform’s platform, but from the performative cruelty, the opportunity to lash out. What we are watching is a perverse form of affective class politics: the spectacle of a millionaire grifter pretending to “say the unsayable” to the delight of those whose actual conditions he will worsen. Farage offers not solidarity, but vengeance – and always against the wrong people.

Labour’s failure is real. Its abandonment of transformative politics, its equivocation on war, its pandering to the tabloids – all of it invites disillusion. But there is no dignity in reaction. And no future in retreating into the arms of a man whose every policy would tighten the grip of capital on our lives.

Labour voters tempted to send a message need to think carefully. Farage doesn’t want reform; he wants regression. Voting Reform UK is not a warning shot to Starmer’s cautious technocracy. It’s surrendering ground to reactionary politics that would leave working-class communities divided, dispossessed, and even more vulnerable.

This isn’t politics-as-usual. It’s politics as punishment.

Reform UK won’t just park tanks on Labour’s lawn, they’ll jackboot straight down your high street.


Artificial Intelligence (9) Book Review (78) Books (82) Britain (35) Capitalism (9) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) diary (11) Donald J Trump (45) Elon Musk (9) Europe (11) Film (11) France (14) History (9) Imperialism (16) Iran (10) Israel (14) Keir Starmer (10) Labour Government (25) Labour Party (9) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (13) Nigel Farage (13) Palestine (9) Protest (14) Reform UK (21) Russia (12) Television (9) United States of America (85) War (19) Work (9) Working Class (9)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A vintage revolver mounted on a plain beige wooden wall, evoking the concept of Chekhov’s gun. The weapon is displayed in profile with a dark blued metal frame and a worn wooden grip, lit softly to highlight its aged, utilitarian design.
Alexander Dugin

The Gospel of World War Three: Alexander Dugin and the Death Cult of Civilisation

Alexander Dugin’s latest polemic is not political analysis but fascist sermon—an apocalyptic blueprint in which nuclear war is both inevitable and desirable. Cloaked in the language of sovereignty and tradition, it is a call to arms for a new ideology of holy Russian power. What begins with Fordow ends with the end of humanity. And for that reason alone, it demands scrutiny—not celebration. You listening, tech bros?

Read More »
A square-cropped image featuring the bold black text "THE SAMSON OPTION" in all capital letters on a cream background. The second "O" in "OPTION" is stylised with the upper half containing the Israeli flag and the lower half the American flag, symbolising the book’s geopolitical focus
Iran

The Bomb in the Basement, the Bomb in the Mountains: Israel, Iran, and the Nuclear Hypocrisy of the West

The next state to cross the nuclear threshold won’t be doing anything new. It’ll be following the path Israel already took—building the bomb in secret, shielded by silence and strategic utility. The real precedent was set decades ago in the Negev. That’s the hypocrisy at the heart of the so-called international order: one bomb is a threat to civilisation, the other a pillar of it. This isn’t about non-proliferation. It’s about who gets to own the apocalypse.

Read More »
A stylised, screen-printed poster shows the Spanish PM in a suit walking past large NATO emblems on bold, flat panels. The image is rendered in a 1968 protest aesthetic with a grainy texture and a limited palette of red, navy blue, and beige. The composition evokes vintage political posters, with stark contrast and minimal detail emphasising the symbolism of militarism and conformity.
Donald J Trump

Only Spain Has Got It Right

At The Hague summit, NATO committed to spending 5% of GDP on defence and security by 2035—a figure with no strategic rationale and every sign of submission to Donald Trump. Only Spain said no. Pedro Sánchez broke ranks, arguing that gutting public services to fund rearmament was neither economically justifiable nor politically defensible. In doing so, he exposed what the rest of Europe won’t admit: this isn’t about defence. It’s about deference. And someone had to refuse.

Read More »