Skip to content

Not the Greens, Not Starmer: Why We Need a New Left Party

Snip of Guardian website
Britain doesn’t need a softer Starmer or a greener liberalism—it needs a new party of revolutionary ecosocialism, built by those brave enough to walk out and fight for class power, not manage its decline.

John McDonnell’s warning delivered in The Guardian on Wednesday, repeated in The Canary, and echoed in The Morning Star—has the mournful tone of someone watching a once-possible future disappear. He says the soul of Labour is at stake, but it isn’t. It was sold off long ago. What we’re seeing now is the final nail hammered in the coffin of Corbynism. There’s no reckoning coming. No surprise uprising. Just another purge, another focus-grouped platform written by people who’ve never met a tenant, a teacher or a striking worker.

Keir Starmer’s “take back control” line, McDonnell notes, is a hollowed-out version of something that once had radical potential. In his Guardian piece, he writes that “if Keir wants to be remembered as a great reforming prime minister, he has to start now.” But this is fantasy. Starmer doesn’t want to reform anything. He wants to manage decline, softly. He wants to govern like Blair without the landslide or the ideas.

And what of the Greens? Prospect notes they’re no longer the party of the anti-austerity moment. Their leadership, lacking class politics and rooted more in NGO-speak than movement struggle, offers climate concern without confrontation. They mouth climate justice but trim radical commitments. Green reformism wants to sand down the sharp edges of extinction. It won’t stop the machine.

What’s needed isn’t a softer shade of green, but revolutionary ecosocialism: a politics that names the enemy—capitalism—and organises to take it down. Climate collapse, racial injustice, imperial war, and the violent border regime aren’t accidents or deviations. They are how the system survives—by extraction, dispossession, and control. A new party has to start from that truth, not from the fantasy that capital can be reasoned with.

And we don’t just need a new party—we have MPs who must help build it. Zarah Sultana and John McDonnell remain outside the parliamentary Labour Party, their whips still not restored. Richard Burgon, Ian Byrne, and Rebecca Long-Bailey were brought back in February but have been kept on the margins. Jeremy Corbyn, expelled in all but name, still commands huge support across the movement. These MPs have seen up close what Labour has become: a hostile environment for socialism, protest, and working-class organising. If they stay, they lend Starmer legitimacy. If they leave together, they could ignite something far bigger. The time for appeals and internal fights is over. The time is now to walk out and help build the party we need.

That party doesn’t exist yet. It’s not inside Labour. It’s not waiting in the wings with a leadership challenge. And it’s not the Greens. It must be new. Red and green. Angry and organised. Not to tweak policy, but to build class power.

Starmer’s platform confirms it: nothing to scare capital, just smooth talk about stability. As The Canary puts it, clinging to a McDonnell comeback is clinging to a corpse. Even he stops short of saying what needs to be said: the party’s over. Inside games won’t cut it.

And yet, nothing has replaced it. Just drift. The Morning Star captures the anxiety. Starmer is leaving the flank open for Reform UK. But this isn’t just misjudgement. It’s the result of a politics that sees working-class people as a threat to manage, not a class to empower.

Labour fears the left and flinches before the right. It triangulates on crime, migration, protest. And when the backlash comes. From Reform, from Farage, from the streets. It’ll say its hands were tied.

A new party has to break that logic. It must stand with the junior doctors on picket lines and the refugees facing dawn raids. It must say plainly: Britain is broken because capitalism broke it. Landlords, bosses and billionaires run it for profit. Labour and the Tories, red and blue managers of the same rot, won’t change that.

We don’t need Starmer 2.0. We don’t need the Greens. We need revolutionary ecosocialism. Class-rooted. Movement-built. Organised to win. The job now isn’t to save Labour. It’s to replace it.


Artificial Intelligence (9) Book Review (78) Books (82) Britain (35) Capitalism (9) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) diary (11) Donald J Trump (45) Europe (11) Film (11) France (14) History (9) Imperialism (16) Iran (10) Israel (14) Keir Starmer (10) Labour Government (25) Labour Party (9) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (13) Nigel Farage (13) Protest (14) Reform UK (21) Russia (12) Television (9) United States of America (85) War (19) Work (9) Working Class (9)


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A vintage revolver mounted on a plain beige wooden wall, evoking the concept of Chekhov’s gun. The weapon is displayed in profile with a dark blued metal frame and a worn wooden grip, lit softly to highlight its aged, utilitarian design.
Alexander Dugin

The Gospel of World War Three: Alexander Dugin and the Death Cult of Civilisation

Alexander Dugin’s latest polemic is not political analysis but fascist sermon—an apocalyptic blueprint in which nuclear war is both inevitable and desirable. Cloaked in the language of sovereignty and tradition, it is a call to arms for a new ideology of holy Russian power. What begins with Fordow ends with the end of humanity. And for that reason alone, it demands scrutiny—not celebration. You listening, tech bros?

Read More »
A square-cropped image featuring the bold black text "THE SAMSON OPTION" in all capital letters on a cream background. The second "O" in "OPTION" is stylised with the upper half containing the Israeli flag and the lower half the American flag, symbolising the book’s geopolitical focus
Iran

The Bomb in the Basement, the Bomb in the Mountains: Israel, Iran, and the Nuclear Hypocrisy of the West

The next state to cross the nuclear threshold won’t be doing anything new. It’ll be following the path Israel already took—building the bomb in secret, shielded by silence and strategic utility. The real precedent was set decades ago in the Negev. That’s the hypocrisy at the heart of the so-called international order: one bomb is a threat to civilisation, the other a pillar of it. This isn’t about non-proliferation. It’s about who gets to own the apocalypse.

Read More »
A stylised, screen-printed poster shows the Spanish PM in a suit walking past large NATO emblems on bold, flat panels. The image is rendered in a 1968 protest aesthetic with a grainy texture and a limited palette of red, navy blue, and beige. The composition evokes vintage political posters, with stark contrast and minimal detail emphasising the symbolism of militarism and conformity.
Donald J Trump

Only Spain Has Got It Right

At The Hague summit, NATO committed to spending 5% of GDP on defence and security by 2035—a figure with no strategic rationale and every sign of submission to Donald Trump. Only Spain said no. Pedro Sánchez broke ranks, arguing that gutting public services to fund rearmament was neither economically justifiable nor politically defensible. In doing so, he exposed what the rest of Europe won’t admit: this isn’t about defence. It’s about deference. And someone had to refuse.

Read More »