Skip to content
Graphic that shows a AK 47 with a tag saying "property of the SAS"
We were told this was a war for hearts and minds, but what we gave them was a bullet to the head, or a slit throat, and a culture of impunity that stretched from the killing fields of Helmand to the corridors of Whitehall.

We were told they were elite. The best of the best. The quiet professionals. Silent, swift, surgical. That’s the language used to describe Western special forces. Britain’s SAS and SBS, America’s Navy SEALs, Australia’s SASR. But now, after two decades of occupation and bloodshed in Iraq and Afghanistan, it’s clear they weren’t elite soldiers. They were, in too many cases, extrajudicial death squads operating with state approval. The longer the so-called “War on Terror” stretched, the more it looked like a license to kill, and then lie about it.

The revelations from BBC Panorama are staggering not for their contentrumours of SAS war crimes have circulated for years, but for the sheer volume of testimony now on the record. Thirty special forces veterans. Eyewitness accounts. Executions of handcuffed detainees, including children. Slitting the throats of wounded Afghans. Staging photos with planted weapons and doctored reports. It was a game, a leaderboard. “Kills” were counted and compared, like COD points in a snuff video game.

None of it was hidden. It wasn’t a case of rogue actors or one-off atrocities. It was standard operating procedure. Entire regiments were intoxicated by violence. “Mob mentality,” one veteran said. “Psychotic murderers,” said another. If a man had been detained and released more than once, “there was no attempt to capture him” the next time round. You confirmed the ID, then you executed them. Sometimes they didn’t even bother with that. “They’d go in and shoot everyone sleeping there, on entry.”

This isn’t counter-insurgency. This is a kill culture.

And it wasn’t confined to the British. In Australia, the Brereton Report uncovered “credible evidence” of war crimes committed by SAS soldiers between 2005 and 2016. Afghan civilians shot dead in fields and villages. Weapons planted. Junior soldiers ordered to execute prisoners to “blood” themselves. One ex-soldier, Oliver Schulz, is now the first Australian serviceman charged with a war crime. Footage apparently shows him calmly shooting an unarmed man at close range.

The Americans, as ever, were more brazen. Navy SEAL Chief Eddie Gallagher posed for photographs with a dead teenage ISIS fighter he was accused of stabbing to death. Witnesses said he shot civilians for fun. His SEAL team members tried to report him and were smeared as traitors. Gallagher was ultimately acquitted of murder, convicted only for the selfie with the corpse, and was later pardoned by Donald Trump. A war criminal elevated into a culture-war martyr.

So what links these cases? The answer isn’t just a breakdown in discipline. It’s impunity. State-sanctioned violence against racialised others. The same pattern: elite troops acting as if laws don’t apply to them, covering up their crimes with help from above. Reports falsified. Photographs staged. Legal advice given to make extrajudicial killings look like legitimate threats. In one SAS case, “Do you remember someone making a sudden move?” a senior officer asks. “Oh yeah, I do now.”

It was systemic. And they all knew.

David Cameron was warned again and again by Hamid Karzai that British forces were murdering civilians. He chose to do nothing. The Ministry of Defence continues to stonewall. Australia is only now moving to prosecute individuals. In the US, the worst offenders are lionised. Meanwhile, the families of the victims. Afghans mostly, nameless to us. Have had to bury their children and live under the threat of drone warfare, economic sanctions, and now, the return of the Taliban.

These were not wars for democracy. They were colonial wars of pacification, waged by rich nations on poor ones, and sold as moral crusades. The West exported barbarism, then called it civilisation. The perpetrators, as they always do, came home to medals, promotions, and PR campaigns. The dead were left in shallow graves. Their stories buried until whistleblowers, at great personal risk, spoke out.

We were told this was about hearts and minds. But what we gave them were bullets and knives.

And if the inquiry drags on, delayed, defanged, buried under legal process, redaction, and official denial. Then Britain will have done what empire always does: made its own atrocities disappear.


Artificial Intelligence Book Review Books Britain Capitalism Conservative Government Creeping Fascism Crime and Punishment diary Donald J Trump Elon Musk Europe Film France Gaza History Imperialism Iran Israel Keir Starmer Labour Government Labour Party Marxist Theory Migrants Nigel Farage Palestine Protest Reform UK Russia Television Ukraine United States of America War Work Working Class

One Response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

Imperialism

No One Is Above the Law—Not Even the SAS

The state demands loyalty from its killers, and contempt for those who ask why. To question the SAS is treated as heresy. To investigate them, as betrayal. But no one is above the law. Not even the men with night-vision goggles and state-sanctioned impunity. If the victims of British state violence are to be denied justice so that the myth of military virtue can remain intact, then we are not a democracy. We continue to be an empire that refuses to admit it.

Read More »
A weathered and torn political poster clings to a rough concrete wall. The poster reads “SOCIALISM OR BARBARISM, 2029?” with the words “SOCIALISM” and “2029?” in bold black and “BARBARISM” in bold red. The edges of the poster are frayed and peeling, suggesting age and neglect.
Green Party

The Left Breaks Cover: Sultana, Corbyn, and the Case for a New Party — With McDonnell at the Helm?

The Labour Party under Starmer has become a machine for silencing dissent. Abbott, Shaheen, Driscoll, and others have been smeared, blocked, or expelled. The party has moved right on immigration, welfare, protest, and Palestine — and done so proudly. Sultana’s resignation wasn’t a betrayal of Labour values. It was a defence of them. And if a new left party is to be more than symbolic, it needs more than moral clarity. It needs leadership. Corbyn remains the figurehead, but John McDonnell (articulate, disciplined, and trusted) is the one who could anchor this project. He may not want the crown. But that is exactly what makes him the right person to hold it.

Read More »