Dugin Watch: Delay Is Not Peace, Dugin’s Fifty-Day Fever Dream

At the top, a stylised Doomsday Clock shows the time at 89 seconds to midnight, its right edge crumbling into scattered debris. Below, a tattered folder labelled “EPSTEIN FILES” lies tilted on the ground, next to a worn red MAGA hat. The entire composition is in grainy sepia tones with strong black and red accents, evoking urgency and political decay.
Dugin doesn’t need Trump to lead anymore. He just needs him to stall. The real project now is building a soft-theocratic death cult that prays for collapse but never acts. Spectators waiting for revelation, not revolution. Fifty days to Armageddon. Maybe. Maybe not. That’s the point.

There’s a strange admission at the heart of Dugin’s latest dispatch: that Trump, the great Western hope of Eurasianism, is now a “faltering” figure. But it’s less a break with past Duginist myth-making than its mutation. The narrative no longer needs Trump to be heroic. It only needs him to be weak enough to make apocalypse feel inevitable.

What we are watching is not political commentary but continued eschatological drift. In Dugin’s hands, geopolitics becomes prophecy constantly deferred. The ‘fifty days’ motif is revealing. This is not a timeframe for policy, but a fevered half-biblical pause. In this imaginary, the world teeters on the edge of nuclear war not because of structural imperialism or inter-capitalist competition, but because one man dithers in his messianic duty.

“Now I loudly proclaim that I proclaim nothing.”

This could be a line from Waiting for Godot, but Dugin means it as a revelation. Trump’s indecision is framed not as cowardice, but tragic grandeur. We have the antihero failing to choose, and thus guaranteeing the apocalypse’s eventual return. The structure mirrors earlier Dugin pieces: tension, betrayal, inevitable war. But this time the betrayal is personal. Trump hasn’t just failed geopolitically; he’s failed to name Epstein’s clients. The conspiracy of paedophiles and the threat of Armageddon are collapsed into a single moral frame.

Dugin’s trick is to cast the MAGA base as both betrayed flock and righteous army. Not the victorious vanguard of American collapse, but a bitter, abandoned militia left muttering about a false prophet. This isn’t a swerve. It’s the natural next stage. Duginism was never about material forces; it was myth from the start. Now it’s just mysticism, with delay, deferral, secrets not yet revealed. The war’s always just over the horizon, the truth always behind the next curtain.

But who is Dugin even talking to in English? Not Trump. Not the MAGA faithful. Not Russians. His Substack is read by a mix of alt-right cosplayers, conspiracy influencers, and bored post-left mystics looking for a new daddy figure. It’s the background noise of decline. All posture, no politics. The kind of thing that passes for strategy in corners of Telegram where quoting Evola is mistaken for thought. He’s not shaping policy; he’s feeding a delusion. A soft-theocratic death cult of spectators, not actors.1

That’s the danger: not that Trump will start a war with Russia, but that people like Dugin are constantly preparing the ideological terrain for when someone does. The call is not to analyse power but to await revelation. While Dugin claims to scorn liberalism, his entire worldview now hinges on the liberal idea he pretends to detest, that history is made by the sovereign will of one great man.

If Trump is that man, and fails, then history’s only response (in this cosmogony) is fire.

Footnotes
  1. Julius Evola (1898–1974) was an Italian fascist philosopher and esotericist whose writings — notably Revolt Against the Modern World and Men Among the Ruins — reject democracy, equality, and modernity in favour of a mythical, hierarchical order rooted in spiritual elitism and authoritarian rule. A favourite of postwar neo-fascists, his work remains influential among today’s far-right ideologues, from Traditionalists to Telegram shitposters. ↩︎


One Response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

Britain

Theft by Design: How Right to Buy Looted the Public Realm

Right to Buy was never just a housing policy. It was a weapon. It stripped councils of their power, turned tenants into property owners, and recast collective provision as individual gain. The result wasn’t freedom but fragmentation: social housing gutted, rents soaring, and the right to strike undermined by the threat of eviction. Thatcher didn’t just sell homes. She sold a new class alignment, and we’re still living in its ruins.

Read More »
Nuclear Weapons

Eighty Years Since Hiroshima. We’re Closer Now.

In 1984, we built a nuclear bunker out of cardboard boxes in the corner of our classroom. Each of us brought something for survival—Look-In mags, tins of beans, but no tin opener. Even as kids, we knew it was useless. That was the point. You couldn’t market nuclear war as survivable. Forty years on, the language has changed but the logic remains. The bomb hasn’t gone away, it’s just become background noise. The treaties are gone. The madmen are in charge. And the system that built the bomb still holds it, not to use necessarily, but to remind us who gets to decide if we live.

Read More »
A close-up photograph of a dark grey suit jacket with a red circular badge pinned to the left lapel. The badge features bold white text that reads "JOIN A UNION" in all capital letters. The image is softly lit, with the badge clearly in focus and the texture of the suit fabric visible in the background.
Eddie Dempsey

The Right to Strike Is Not a Threat—It’s a Minimum Demand

The modern-day barons don’t run trade unions, they sail £100 million yachts and bankroll governments. Yet it’s the rail cleaner or the guard who’s cast as the threat. What’s truly appalling is not that Eddie Dempsey wants to strike fast, but that workers can’t strike in solidarity with Palestinians, can’t refuse to load weapons bound for Gaza, can’t use their collective strength to win better conditions across sectors. The right fears not chaos—but class power.

Read More »