Skip to content

The Unsustainability of Corporate “Greedflation” and its Potential Impact on Capitalism

Painting depicting greed
In a recent Fortune article, global strategist Albert Edwards warns of the unsustainable trend of corporate "greedflation" and its potential to undermine faith in capitalism.

In a recent article published on Fortune, global strategist Albert Edwards from Société Générale highlights the growing issue of corporate greedflation, a phenomenon where corporations take advantage of rising raw material costs to inflate prices and expand profit margins. Citing a study from the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Edwards contends that “markup growth” was the key driver of inflation in 2021, surpassing its historical significance in economic history. He warns that this unsustainable trend could lead to a loss of faith in capitalism.

The Unprecedented Rise of Corporate “Greedflation”

Albert Edwards characterises the current economic cycle as exhibiting “unprecedented and astonishing levels of corporate greedflation.” In this context, “greedflation” refers to companies exploiting the opportunity of increasing raw material costs to justify raising prices, even when the hikes are not proportionate to the actual cost increases. This strategy ultimately results in a widening of profit margins for corporations at the expense of consumers.

The concept of “greedflation” is not new and can be observed in various industries. For example, the tech industry has seen instances of companies raising prices for their products without any significant changes to the features or quality, simply because they are market leaders and can afford to do so. It is the consumers who bear the burden of these price hikes, while the corporations continue to rake in profits.

Markup Growth as the Primary Driver of Inflation

Markup growth refers to the increase in the difference between the cost of production and the final selling price of a product. According to a study conducted by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, markup growth has been the most significant factor driving inflation in 2021. This contradicts the commonly held belief that inflation is primarily caused by higher commodity prices or wage growth. The study suggests that businesses are increasing their profit margins by raising prices even when their production costs have not increased proportionally, leading to an overall increase in the cost of goods and services. This conclusion challenges the commonly held belief that higher commodity prices or wage growth are the primary forces behind inflationary pressures.

The Unsustainability of this Trend and its Impact on Capitalism

Edwards emphasises that this trend of corporate “greedflation” is unsustainable, as it could lead to a loss of faith in capitalism. No bad thing! The growing gap between corporate profits and the financial strain experienced by consumers may result in widespread disillusionment with the capitalist system, sparking calls for reforms or more drastic changes.

Edwards’ warning of “greedflation” is not unfounded. In recent years, the top 1% of earners (looking at you billionaires) have been accumulating wealth at an unprecedented rate, while the income of the bottom 50% has stagnated or even declined. Many argue that this income inequality is a direct result of corporate greed, with companies prioritising their profits over the well-being of their workers and customers. This trend is particularly evident in industries such as healthcare and pharmaceuticals, where the cost of life-saving drugs and treatments has skyrocketed, leaving many unable to afford the care they need. As a result, there is growing discontent among the working and middle classes, who feel that the system is rigged against them. If left unchecked, this could lead to a widespread loss of faith in capitalism and calls for a more equitable economic system.

Wider Concerns Among Economists

It is important to note that Albert Edwards is not alone in expressing concern about this trend. Other economists have also warned that corporate greed is playing a significant role in driving inflation, further exacerbating the burden on consumers. This growing consensus among experts underscores the urgency of addressing this issue.

In the United Kingdom, the price of fuel has increased by almost 50% (June 2022) in the past year. This is due to a number of factors, including the war in Ukraine and supply chain disruptions. However, some analysts believe that oil companies are also taking advantage of the situation to raise prices.

For example, Shell, one of the largest oil company in the world reported a profit of $20.6 billion in the last quarter of 2022. This is 25% more than the company’s profit in the same quarter of 2021. Shell CEO Ben Van Beurden has defended the company’s high profits, saying “At the same time, there is a responsibility with making money, and that is that we continue to invest in energy security, and we do, and in the energy transition.”

However, some critics argue that Shell is simply price gouging consumers. In return Shell would point out that the company’s profit margins may be at record highs, however they are not passing on the full cost of rising oil prices to consumers.

This is just one example of how corporate greed is playing a significant role in driving inflation. There are many other examples, such as the rising prices of food, housing, and heating. As these prices continue to rise, it is putting a strain on household budgets and making it difficult for people to make ends meet.

Potential Government Intervention

As concern over corporate “greedflation” mounts, governments may be prompted to take action to combat this trend. Governments can take several steps to combat corporate “greedflation”. One of the potential steps is to introduce regulations to limit price gouging. This can discourage companies from overpricing their products and services. Another step is implementing stricter antitrust policies. This can prevent companies from dominating the market and abusing their power to drive up prices. Governments can also encourage increased competition in various industries. This can result in lower prices and quality products as companies compete customers. However, the effectiveness of these measures may vary depending on the specific circumstances and the industry in question.

Shell, mentioned earlier, paid just £134 million in UK corporation tax in 2022, despite making a profit of $40 billion. This is because Shell is able to reduce its tax bill by investing in new oil and gas production in the North Sea. The Conservative government (reluctantly) introduced a windfall tax on energy companies in May 2022, in an attempt to raise money to help people with the rising cost of living. However, the windfall tax does not apply to companies that invest in new oil and gas production (which makes a mockery of the net zero target). As a result, Shell was able to reduce its tax bill by £500 million.

The low tax payment by Shell has been criticised by politicians and campaigners. They argue that Shell is making a profit at the expense of consumers, and that the company should be paying more tax. The government has defended the windfall tax, saying that it is fair and that it will raise £5 billion to help people with the rising cost of living. However, it is clear that the windfall tax is not having the desired effect. Shell is still making a profit, and consumers are still paying high prices for energy.

Addressing the Future of Capitalism and Corporate Greedflation

The rise of corporate “greedflation”, as highlighted by Albert Edwards, presents a significant challenge to the sustainability of capitalism. The disproportionate focus on expanding profit margins at the expense of consumers threatens to erode public trust in the system, potentially leading to calls for reform or more radical changes. As an increasing number of economists echo Edwards’ concerns about this trend, the question remains whether governments will take decisive action to confront the issue and permanently eliminate this harmful ideology or continue to uphold the principles of capitalism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Artificial Intelligence Book Review Books Britain Capitalism Conservative Government Creeping Fascism diary Donald J Trump Elon Musk Europe Film France History Imperialism Iran Israel Keir Starmer Labour Government Labour Party Marxist Theory Migrants Nigel Farage Palestine Protest Reform UK Russia Suella Braverman Television Trade Unionism Ukraine United States of America War Work Working Class

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A vintage revolver mounted on a plain beige wooden wall, evoking the concept of Chekhov’s gun. The weapon is displayed in profile with a dark blued metal frame and a worn wooden grip, lit softly to highlight its aged, utilitarian design.
Alexander Dugin

The Gospel of World War Three: Alexander Dugin and the Death Cult of Civilisation

Alexander Dugin’s latest polemic is not political analysis but fascist sermon—an apocalyptic blueprint in which nuclear war is both inevitable and desirable. Cloaked in the language of sovereignty and tradition, it is a call to arms for a new ideology of holy Russian power. What begins with Fordow ends with the end of humanity. And for that reason alone, it demands scrutiny—not celebration. You listening, tech bros?

Read More »
A square-cropped image featuring the bold black text "THE SAMSON OPTION" in all capital letters on a cream background. The second "O" in "OPTION" is stylised with the upper half containing the Israeli flag and the lower half the American flag, symbolising the book’s geopolitical focus
Iran

The Bomb in the Basement, the Bomb in the Mountains: Israel, Iran, and the Nuclear Hypocrisy of the West

The next state to cross the nuclear threshold won’t be doing anything new. It’ll be following the path Israel already took—building the bomb in secret, shielded by silence and strategic utility. The real precedent was set decades ago in the Negev. That’s the hypocrisy at the heart of the so-called international order: one bomb is a threat to civilisation, the other a pillar of it. This isn’t about non-proliferation. It’s about who gets to own the apocalypse.

Read More »
A stylised, screen-printed poster shows the Spanish PM in a suit walking past large NATO emblems on bold, flat panels. The image is rendered in a 1968 protest aesthetic with a grainy texture and a limited palette of red, navy blue, and beige. The composition evokes vintage political posters, with stark contrast and minimal detail emphasising the symbolism of militarism and conformity.
Donald J Trump

Only Spain Has Got It Right

At The Hague summit, NATO committed to spending 5% of GDP on defence and security by 2035—a figure with no strategic rationale and every sign of submission to Donald Trump. Only Spain said no. Pedro Sánchez broke ranks, arguing that gutting public services to fund rearmament was neither economically justifiable nor politically defensible. In doing so, he exposed what the rest of Europe won’t admit: this isn’t about defence. It’s about deference. And someone had to refuse.

Read More »