Skip to content

A Crime Against Humanity in the Making?

An IDF Caterpillar D9 armored bulldozer demolishing a house in the Gaza Strip during the Second Intifada
Donald Trump’s latest scheme—expelling Gaza’s population to neighbouring countries and transforming the strip into a capitalist playground, exposes the brutal logic of imperialism. With threats to withhold aid from Egypt and Jordan unless they absorb millions of displaced Palestinians, this plan is not just a violation of international law but a blueprint for ethnic cleansing.

Donald Trump, the would-be emperor of reaction, is at it again. His latest scheme, to forcibly expel the people of Gaza and turn the strip into the “Riviera of the Middle East” is nothing short of ethnic cleansing dressed up as capitalist fantasy. Worse still, he’s using U.S. imperialist leverage to bully Egypt and Jordan into taking in millions of displaced Palestinians by threatening to cut off aid.

This is a textbook example of how imperialism operates: dispossession, coercion, and exploitation. The forced transfer of an entire population is a flagrant violation of international law. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), such actions constitute war crimes and crimes against humanity. The Geneva Conventions prohibit the forced displacement of people under occupation. But Trump, like every U.S. president before him, operates under the assumption that laws apply to others, never to Washington’s chosen rulers.

“But Trump, like every U.S. president before him, operates under the assumption that laws apply to others, never to Washington’s chosen rulers.”

Ethnic Cleansing and Capitalist Reconstruction

The essence of Trump’s proposal is not just the expulsion of Palestinians but the capitalist redevelopment of Gaza. The “Riviera of the Middle East” vision is a grotesque demonstration of how capitalism turns mass suffering into a business opportunity. First, the land must be cleared—Palestinians expelled, resistance crushed. Then, Western and Gulf investors can sweep in, transforming a battlefield into a playground for the rich.

This is disaster capitalism in its purest form. It follows the logic of every imperial occupation: erase the indigenous population, privatise the ruins, and repackage the theft as “rebuilding.” But Trump’s plan doesn’t stop at Gaza’s borders—it extends to regional strong-arming, using economic blackmail to force neighbouring states into complicity.

This is disaster capitalism in its purest form. It follows the logic of every imperial occupation: erase the indigenous population, privatise the ruins, and repackage the theft as “rebuilding.”

This economic blackmail is not limited to Palestinians alone. In a move reminiscent of classic imperialist coercion, Trump is threatening to withhold aid from Egypt and Jordan unless they agree to absorb millions of displaced Palestinians. Both countries rely on U.S. financial support, Egypt receives over $1.3 billion in military aid annually, while Jordan, home to millions of Palestinian refugees, is a key recipient of economic assistance. By leveraging this dependency, Washington is attempting to strong-arm these governments into facilitating a mass expulsion. This is not humanitarian policy; it is imperialist extortion, forcing neighbouring states to bear the cost of Israel’s settler-colonial expansion while ensuring the complete erasure of Palestinian national identity.

Can Trump Be Prosecuted for War Crimes?

Legally, Trump’s actions should land him in The Hague. The ICC has jurisdiction over crimes against humanity, and forced displacement is explicitly listed. Yet, the U.S. is not a signatory to the Rome Statute, meaning Washington protects its leaders from international accountability. The American Service-Members’ Protection Act—dubbed the “Hague Invasion Act”—even authorises military intervention if any U.S. official is detained by the ICC. In other words, the U.S. reserves the right to commit war crimes with impunity.

There is, however, the principle of universal jurisdiction, which allows national courts to prosecute individuals for grave crimes regardless of where they were committed. This has been used to target figures like Chile’s Pinochet and former Israeli officials, but no U.S. president has ever been held accountable in this way. The reason is clear: Western legal systems are designed to prosecute the enemies of capital, not its chief enforcers.

“Western legal systems are designed to prosecute the enemies of capital, not its chief enforcers.”

Trump’s insistence that no Palestinian should have the right to return to their homes is a blatant violation of international law and multiple UN resolutions. The right of return is enshrined in UN General Assembly Resolution 194 (1948), which states that Palestinian refugees should be allowed to return to their homes or receive compensation if they choose not to. Further, UN Security Council Resolutions 242 (1967) and 338 (1973) reaffirm the necessity of a just resolution for refugees. By openly disregarding these legal frameworks, Trump aligns himself with the longstanding Zionist strategy of demographic engineering—erasing Palestinian existence to solidify settler-colonial dominance. His attempt to “buy” Gaza by expelling its people and turning it into a tourist hub is nothing more than a modern iteration of colonial land theft.

Imperialism, Not Justice

Ultimately, whether Trump faces trial will not be determined by legal norms but by political power. The U.S. and its allies will not allow a former president to be prosecuted in The Hague, but if the political tides shift, there could be domestic attempts to hold him accountable. More likely, his plan will be scrapped, not because of legal pressure but because it threatens to destabilise U.S. imperial control in the region.

The lesson is clear: justice under capitalism is a farce. The only real answer to war crimes, forced displacement, and imperialist plunder is mass resistance. Gaza’s fate will not be determined by courtrooms in The Hague but by the Palestinian people themselves and by the movements of workers and oppressed peoples across the world who refuse to let imperialism dictate history.


Artificial Intelligence (9) Book Review (78) Books (82) Britain (35) Capitalism (9) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) diary (11) Donald J Trump (45) Elon Musk (9) Europe (11) Film (11) France (14) History (9) Imperialism (16) Iran (10) Israel (14) Keir Starmer (10) Labour Government (25) Labour Party (9) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (13) Nigel Farage (13) Palestine (9) Protest (14) Reform UK (21) Russia (12) Suella Braverman (8) Television (9) Ukraine (9) United States of America (85) War (19) Work (9) Working Class (9)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A vintage revolver mounted on a plain beige wooden wall, evoking the concept of Chekhov’s gun. The weapon is displayed in profile with a dark blued metal frame and a worn wooden grip, lit softly to highlight its aged, utilitarian design.
Alexander Dugin

The Gospel of World War Three: Alexander Dugin and the Death Cult of Civilisation

Alexander Dugin’s latest polemic is not political analysis but fascist sermon—an apocalyptic blueprint in which nuclear war is both inevitable and desirable. Cloaked in the language of sovereignty and tradition, it is a call to arms for a new ideology of holy Russian power. What begins with Fordow ends with the end of humanity. And for that reason alone, it demands scrutiny—not celebration. You listening, tech bros?

Read More »
A square-cropped image featuring the bold black text "THE SAMSON OPTION" in all capital letters on a cream background. The second "O" in "OPTION" is stylised with the upper half containing the Israeli flag and the lower half the American flag, symbolising the book’s geopolitical focus
Iran

The Bomb in the Basement, the Bomb in the Mountains: Israel, Iran, and the Nuclear Hypocrisy of the West

The next state to cross the nuclear threshold won’t be doing anything new. It’ll be following the path Israel already took—building the bomb in secret, shielded by silence and strategic utility. The real precedent was set decades ago in the Negev. That’s the hypocrisy at the heart of the so-called international order: one bomb is a threat to civilisation, the other a pillar of it. This isn’t about non-proliferation. It’s about who gets to own the apocalypse.

Read More »
A stylised, screen-printed poster shows the Spanish PM in a suit walking past large NATO emblems on bold, flat panels. The image is rendered in a 1968 protest aesthetic with a grainy texture and a limited palette of red, navy blue, and beige. The composition evokes vintage political posters, with stark contrast and minimal detail emphasising the symbolism of militarism and conformity.
Donald J Trump

Only Spain Has Got It Right

At The Hague summit, NATO committed to spending 5% of GDP on defence and security by 2035—a figure with no strategic rationale and every sign of submission to Donald Trump. Only Spain said no. Pedro Sánchez broke ranks, arguing that gutting public services to fund rearmament was neither economically justifiable nor politically defensible. In doing so, he exposed what the rest of Europe won’t admit: this isn’t about defence. It’s about deference. And someone had to refuse.

Read More »