Skip to content

The Lie Is the Point – Why Trump and His Administration Always Deny What They Just Said

A grainy black-and-white newspaper-style image shows Donald Trump speaking at a podium bearing the Presidential Seal, wearing a dark suit and a military-style cap. Behind him, rows of uniformed soldiers in berets stand in formation, their faces slightly blurred, evoking a vintage wartime press photo.
Trump doesn’t lie to persuade—he lies to dominate, using contradiction as a weapon to break truth itself.

It wasn’t a slip of the tongue. It wasn’t a misquote. It wasn’t context lost in translation. Donald Trump stood at a podium at Fort Bragg, declared that California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass were paying agitators to incite violence in the protests. Hours later, when asked directly by reporters, he denied ever saying it. “No, I don’t say the governor and the mayor,” Trump muttered, “I said, somebody’s paying them, I think.”

This isn’t just a contradiction. It’s a pattern. And it’s a strategy.

Trump and his administration lie not in spite of being caught, but because they know they’ll be caught. The lie isn’t meant to deceive in the conventional sense. It’s meant to degrade our shared understanding of reality. One version of events gets pumped out through the rally speech, the next version delivered at the press conference, and a third—clipped, captioned, and conspiratorial—is posted to Homeland Security’s official channels. “California politicians must call off their rioting mob,” their tweet blared, echoing Trump’s fantasy hours after he’d publicly disavowed it.

This is gaslighting at a national scale. The lie doesn’t aim to persuade. It aims to control.

Trump’s technique is lifted straight from the fascist playbook. Say something incendiary. Deny it later. Blame the media for misreporting. Watch the base double down. The goal isn’t coherence. It’s chaos. The faithful will believe both that Trump accused Newsom and Bass and that he didn’t. Both that protesters are paid Soros goons and that Trump respects peaceful dissent. The contradiction doesn’t undermine him; it inoculates him. He is always right—regardless of what he said.

This isn’t new, but it’s becoming more dangerous. The deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles, the floating of Marine involvement, the vilification of local officials. It’s all being lubricated by a propaganda machine that lies in real time, then lies about the lies, while accusing everyone else of lying.

When the state denies its own words, it denies accountability. It erases the very possibility of truth. That’s not just fascism—it’s nihilism.

And that, ultimately, is the point. To blur cause and effect. To render facts irrelevant. To turn every discussion into a debate about whether something happened, rather than what should be done about it.

So why does Trump lie like this?

Because it works.

Because it signals dominance.

And because in his America, truth isn’t something to be upheld—it’s something to be broken.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A weathered and torn political poster clings to a rough concrete wall. The poster reads “SOCIALISM OR BARBARISM, 2029?” with the words “SOCIALISM” and “2029?” in bold black and “BARBARISM” in bold red. The edges of the poster are frayed and peeling, suggesting age and neglect.
Green Party

The Left Breaks Cover: Sultana, Corbyn, and the Case for a New Party — With McDonnell at the Helm?

The Labour Party under Starmer has become a machine for silencing dissent. Abbott, Shaheen, Driscoll, and others have been smeared, blocked, or expelled. The party has moved right on immigration, welfare, protest, and Palestine — and done so proudly. Sultana’s resignation wasn’t a betrayal of Labour values. It was a defence of them. And if a new left party is to be more than symbolic, it needs more than moral clarity. It needs leadership. Corbyn remains the figurehead, but John McDonnell (articulate, disciplined, and trusted) is the one who could anchor this project. He may not want the crown. But that is exactly what makes him the right person to hold it.

Read More »
A black withered Labour rose
Britain

The Art of Losing: Labour’s First Year in Power

Labour’s problem isn’t just that it inherited a broken economy. It’s that it refuses to say so. The party acts like governing is a performance for bond markets and newspaper editors, rather than an act of political leadership. Hard choices are made without explanation. Rollbacks happen without apology. And the public is left wondering: if even Labour doesn’t believe in what it’s doing, why should anyone else?

Read More »