Fawning to Putin in Alaska

A satirical political cartoon shows a caricature of Donald Trump in a suit and blue tie on the left, with a long red carpet unfurling from his open mouth like a tongue. On the right, a caricature of Vladimir Putin in a dark suit and tie steps confidently onto the carpet, looking toward Trump with a smug expression. The background is plain and muted, drawing focus to the exaggerated figures and the symbolic red carpet.
Trump’s Alaska summit with Putin wasn’t diplomacy. It was pure theatre. No ceasefire, no deal, just a spectacle in which Trump played host, rolling out the red carpet for Putin while Ukraine burned in the background.

Donald Trump’s summit with Vladimir Putin in Anchorage was sold as diplomacy, but staged as theatre. Nothing was settled, no ceasefire announced, not even a token gesture towards halting the bloodshed in Ukraine. What it offered instead was spectacle: Putin basking in legitimacy on American soil, Trump basking in Putin. The choreography told us everything we needed to know.

Putin spoke first at the press conference. A break with diplomatic convention, but one that ensured his framing dominated. He rode to the venue in the US presidential limousine, as if to underline that the world’s stage now belongs to him. He invited Trump to Moscow; Trump simpered that it might cause “a little heat” but did not rule it out. The symbolism was unmistakeable: Russia dictating the terms, America nodding along.

Ukraine, meanwhile, was absent. Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the man whose country is being immolated, was nowhere near the table. Trump, who had humiliated him earlier this year alongside JD Vance in the Oval Office, treated him as an afterthought: a phone call “very soon.” In Anchorage, the warmth was reserved for Putin, not for the supposed ally. The message was clear. Ukraine is expendable, an instrument for Trump’s domestic theatre.

This is not an aberration. Trump has always understood foreign policy as a stage for personal grievance. In Alaska he repeated, with Putin’s nodding approval, that the 2020 election was “rigged.” He reminded the press that “Russia wouldn’t have invaded if I had been president.” Putin, ever the opportunist, endorsed the line, feeding Trump’s narrative of betrayal at home while legitimising his rule abroad. The bloodiest war in Europe in eight decades became just another prop in Trump’s long-running pageant of resentment.

So the fighting continues. Even as they sat beneath a screen declaring they were “Pursuing Peace,” reports filtered in of Russian sabotage groups piercing Ukrainian lines, air raid sirens across the east, rumours of nuclear-capable missile tests designed to frighten and bargain. Putin has no interest in peace. Only in time, territory, and leverage. What Trump gifted him in Alaska was time, territory, and leverage’s most precious lubricant: legitimacy.

This is the real achievement of Anchorage. Not a ceasefire, but an embrace. Not negotiations, but capitulation wrapped in choreography. Putin emerges stronger, framed as America’s equal, invited into the White House candidate’s arms. Trump emerges grinning, having proved again that he prefers Russia’s strongman to Ukraine’s elected leader. Zelenskyy is humiliated; NATO sidelined; the Ukrainians still bleeding in Donbas told, once again, that their fate is incidental.

The fawning to Putin matters because it exposes the logic of Trumpism: America First means Ukraine Last. Peace is not the aim, but optics; diplomacy is not dialogue, but a mirror for Trump’s own resentments. Putin understood this from the start. Anchorage proved him right.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

Close-up of a British two pence coin, copper-coloured, showing a heraldic lion in a crosshatched frame with fleur-de-lis corners and the words “TWO PENCE” at the top.
Labour Government

Rachel Reeves and the 2p Trap

The chancellor’s proposed income tax shuffle is clever accountancy but toxic politics — a pledge-break disguised as fiscal discipline, and proof that Labour has trapped itself in rules it cannot escape.

Read More »
An illustration of a red fish (Herring) in profile against a pale background, with the words “RED TERROR” in bold black capitals beneath it.
Charlie Kirk

Red Herring, Not Red Terror

David Frost calls it a new “Red Terror.” The truth is plainer: it’s the Right’s wars, coups and crackdowns that have spilt the deepest blood in politics.

Read More »
Donald J Trump

The Invention of the Narco-Terrorist

Trump’s latest “kinetic strike” killed three unknown Venezuelans he labelled “narco-terrorists.” The phrase is not law but incantation, a word that strips away humanity and legitimises killing. From Vietnam body counts to Obama’s “signature strikes,” America has always named its enemies into existence, and into death.

Read More »