Robert Jenrick’s Radicalism Is Just Authoritarianism in a New Suit

A satirical vintage-style newspaper cartoon of a stocky, muscular politician dressed as a circus strongman. He stands in a black singlet with a thick belt, flexing one arm to show a bicep tattoo reading “Jenrick.” His expression is stern and scowling. At his feet is a heavy kettlebell labelled “LAW.” The caption above reads “THE STRONGMAN POLITICIAN.
Robert Jenrick dresses up an authoritarian wish list as “radical honesty.” From sacking judges to mass deportations, his proposals echo Orbán and Trump more than any British tradition of justice. This isn’t reform, it’s repression in plain sight.

Ben Riley-Smith’s Telegraph profile of Robert Jenrick does the heavy lifting of rebranding a dull ex-minister as a bold “radical thinker.” But what it really showcases is the Tory Party’s drift into authoritarian populism. Jenrick dresses it in the language of “depoliticisation” and “honesty.” What he’s actually selling is an assault on judicial independence and a programme of mass expulsions. Riley-Smith isn’t interrogating Jenrick; he’s workshopping his pitch to Farage’s voters.

The Myth of the ‘Activist Judge’

Jenrick insists that “activist” judges are undermining the neutrality of the courts. It’s a neat inversion. The only way to enforce his version of “neutrality” is by political control. Making judges fireable if they cross the government line. In other words, to purge the judiciary of politics, Jenrick must inject it with politics. It’s the Orbán manoeuvre: accuse the courts of bias, then remake them as an arm of executive power.

“There’s no point extricating ourselves from activist judges in Strasbourg only to be beholden to activist judges here.”

This is not depoliticisation; it is politicisation, in the name of state sovereignty. If a government can sack judges for rulings it dislikes, there is no rule of law left, only the rule of ministers.

Europe, Strasbourg, and the Scapegoat

The ECHR is not really about boats in the Channel. It’s about the minimal legal protections that stop governments deporting entire categories of people en masse. By leaving the ECHR, Jenrick hopes to strip away those obstacles, clearing the path for his fantasy of expulsion: “every single illegal migrant in this country” gone. That language, is not about policy. It is about theatre. A strongman pose.

“We’re going to have to marshal all the resources of the British state.”

To what end? To hunt down tens of thousands of people whose only crime is trying to live here. The Tory base is promised an impossible cleansing operation. The real result will be more raids, more detentions, more cruelty. While the material causes of social crisis, austerity and financialisation, remain untouched.

Trump, Farage, Jenrick

The article asks if Jenrick sounds “a bit Trumpian,” as though that were a curiosity, not the point. Jenrick himself praises Trump for securing the border, signalling that Britain should follow suit. The shadow justice secretary is also careful to flatter Nigel Farage: Reform voters are “angry,” their anger “legitimate,” and Jenrick “shares” it.

“Nigel Farage and Reform speak for millions of people. I share that anger and frustration.”

This is not hedging. It is the Tory Party’s survival instinct: mimic Farage, absorb his voters, borrow his rhetoric. Jenrick’s radicalism is the radicalism of the copycat, a party trailing behind the far right and pretending it is leading.

Radical in Name Only

The Telegraph keeps reaching for the word “radical.” Jenrick’s father’s white van, his diet drugs, his De Gaulle biography, his social media videos. Are all dressed up as signs of a man with a new way of thinking. But deregulation, migrant scapegoating, and attacks on courts are not new. They are the oldest moves in the authoritarian playbook: Orbán purging Hungarian courts, Erdoğan turning judges into servants of the state, Trump filling benches with loyalists, Meloni tightening immigration law, Netanyahu hollowing out judicial checks. Jenrick isn’t inventing anything new. He’s just late to the party.

The radicalism here lies only in the willingness to say the quiet part out loud: that rights must be stripped, judges purged, and deportations escalated. Radical not in vision, but in shamelessness.

The Real Politics at Work

The missing context is the real story. Housing, wages, health, education—none of these crises are caused by asylum seekers or “activist judges.” They are caused by a political economy Jenrick himself once loyally served. Austerity. Financialisation. The demolition of the welfare state.

To blame migrants for austerity is an authoritarian con. To blame judges for Tory failures is to prepare the ground for repression. Jenrick’s “radical honesty” is just the Tory Party’s latest mask.

The Telegraph has written him a calling card, not a critique. If you’re reading this blog and starting to get the feeling I don’t like Robert Jenrick, you would be correct



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

Close-up of a British two pence coin, copper-coloured, showing a heraldic lion in a crosshatched frame with fleur-de-lis corners and the words “TWO PENCE” at the top.
Labour Government

Rachel Reeves and the 2p Trap

The chancellor’s proposed income tax shuffle is clever accountancy but toxic politics — a pledge-break disguised as fiscal discipline, and proof that Labour has trapped itself in rules it cannot escape.

Read More »
An illustration of a red fish (Herring) in profile against a pale background, with the words “RED TERROR” in bold black capitals beneath it.
Charlie Kirk

Red Herring, Not Red Terror

David Frost calls it a new “Red Terror.” The truth is plainer: it’s the Right’s wars, coups and crackdowns that have spilt the deepest blood in politics.

Read More »
Donald J Trump

The Invention of the Narco-Terrorist

Trump’s latest “kinetic strike” killed three unknown Venezuelans he labelled “narco-terrorists.” The phrase is not law but incantation, a word that strips away humanity and legitimises killing. From Vietnam body counts to Obama’s “signature strikes,” America has always named its enemies into existence, and into death.

Read More »