Skip to content

Forceful Irony: Policing & Power

Painting of Stuart Hall produced by Ai
Through the ideas of Stuart Hall, this post looks at the persistent problems of the Metropolitan Police and the complicated relationship between policing, power, and social inequality.

The disquieting revelations revealed by the Guardian today about the Metropolitan Police, as detailed in the forthcoming Casey report, resonate with some of Stuart Hall’s ideas on policing. The report reveals the long-lasting and sneaky problems of sexism, racism, and homophobia in the Met. It shows that these problems are so deep-seated that they haven’t been fixed even though it’s been 20 years since the Macpherson report

Section 6.45 from the Macpherson report shows nothing has changed.
Section 6.45 from the Macpherson report shows nothing has changed

Stuart Hall’s work, especially “Policing the Crisis,” gives important insights into the role of the police in society. He focuses on how the police keep the hegemonic social order in place and how they are involved in the ideological and cultural aspects of social control. Hall’s work sheds light on the larger social and political effects of policing in a capitalist society by looking at how the police keep social inequalities going and keep things the same.

Using Hall’s work, we can say that the police force is an institution that has been around for a long time to keep social order and protect the interests of the dominant class. Racism, sexism, and homophobia are big problems in the Met. These problems are a reflection of the larger structural inequalities in society, which the police force not only reflects but also reinforces. The fact that the Met couldn’t deal with the problems in the Macpherson report well shows how systemic these problems are. 

Hall’s ideas about policing focus on the role of the police in the ideological and cultural aspects of social control, as well as the media’s role in shaping a positive story about the police force. The Casey report singles out the parliamentary and diplomatic protection command as exhibiting high levels of problematic behaviours, which can be interpreted as evidence of the police force’s alignment with the ruling class. In this context, the police are implicated in the maintenance of the capitalist system and the subjugation of the working class. By failing to address the problems of racism, sexism, and homophobia within their ranks, the Met police inadvertently expose their role in perpetuating the oppressive power dynamics inherent in a capitalist society. Meanwhile, the media often reinforces the image of the police as the guardians of order, further legitimising the existing power structures.

By failing to address the problems of racism, sexism, and homophobia within their ranks, the Met police inadvertently expose their role in perpetuating the oppressive power dynamics inherent in a capitalist society. Meanwhile, the media often reinforces the image of the police as the guardians of order, further legitimising the existing power structures.

Dominic Raab’s defence of the “vast majority” of Metropolitan police officers and his commendation of the new commissioner, Sir Mark Rowley, can be seen as an attempt to redeem the image of the police force. However, echoing Hall’s work, this defence only serves to further solidify the idea that the police are an insurmountable problem in society. The structural issues within the police force, exemplified by the Casey report, demonstrate the inherent limitations of reformist measures in addressing the fundamental problems rooted in the capitalist system.

The damning revelations in the Casey report about the Metropolitan Police serve to reinforce the idea that the police force is part of the problem, as it perpetuates systemic inequalities and protects the interests of the ruling class. The inability of the Met to fully address these longstanding issues exposes the limitations of reformist approaches and highlights the need for a radical transformation of the capitalist system, considering the ideological and cultural dimensions of social control.

One response to “Forceful Irony: Policing & Power”

  1. […] imbalances and restore public trust. This metamorphosis must originate from within the institution, acknowledging the structural challenges and the necessity of actions, rather than relying solely on external pressure from affected […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Artificial Intelligence Book Review Books Britain Capitalism China Class Climate Change Conservative Government Conspiracy Theories Creeping Fascism Crime and Punishment diary Donald J Trump Economics Elon Musk Europe Fascism Film France Gaza History Imperialism Iran Israel Keir Starmer Labour Government Labour Party Marxist Theory Migrants Nigel Farage Palestine Protest Reform UK Russia Suella Braverman tarrifs Television Trade Unionism Ukraine United States of America Verso Books War Work Working Class

One Response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A vintage revolver mounted on a plain beige wooden wall, evoking the concept of Chekhov’s gun. The weapon is displayed in profile with a dark blued metal frame and a worn wooden grip, lit softly to highlight its aged, utilitarian design.
Alexander Dugin

The Gospel of World War Three: Alexander Dugin and the Death Cult of Civilisation

Alexander Dugin’s latest polemic is not political analysis but fascist sermon—an apocalyptic blueprint in which nuclear war is both inevitable and desirable. Cloaked in the language of sovereignty and tradition, it is a call to arms for a new ideology of holy Russian power. What begins with Fordow ends with the end of humanity. And for that reason alone, it demands scrutiny—not celebration. You listening, tech bros?

Read More »
A square-cropped image featuring the bold black text "THE SAMSON OPTION" in all capital letters on a cream background. The second "O" in "OPTION" is stylised with the upper half containing the Israeli flag and the lower half the American flag, symbolising the book’s geopolitical focus
Iran

The Bomb in the Basement, the Bomb in the Mountains: Israel, Iran, and the Nuclear Hypocrisy of the West

The next state to cross the nuclear threshold won’t be doing anything new. It’ll be following the path Israel already took—building the bomb in secret, shielded by silence and strategic utility. The real precedent was set decades ago in the Negev. That’s the hypocrisy at the heart of the so-called international order: one bomb is a threat to civilisation, the other a pillar of it. This isn’t about non-proliferation. It’s about who gets to own the apocalypse.

Read More »
A stylised, screen-printed poster shows the Spanish PM in a suit walking past large NATO emblems on bold, flat panels. The image is rendered in a 1968 protest aesthetic with a grainy texture and a limited palette of red, navy blue, and beige. The composition evokes vintage political posters, with stark contrast and minimal detail emphasising the symbolism of militarism and conformity.
Donald J Trump

Only Spain Has Got It Right

At The Hague summit, NATO committed to spending 5% of GDP on defence and security by 2035—a figure with no strategic rationale and every sign of submission to Donald Trump. Only Spain said no. Pedro Sánchez broke ranks, arguing that gutting public services to fund rearmament was neither economically justifiable nor politically defensible. In doing so, he exposed what the rest of Europe won’t admit: this isn’t about defence. It’s about deference. And someone had to refuse.

Read More »