Skip to content

Sisters Betrayed: The Ongoing Crisis of Misogyny and Abuse in UK Trade Unions

ME TU image - person holding placade which states TUC - stand down perpetrators.
As revelations of systemic misogyny and abuse in prominent UK trade unions expose the corrupt old boys' networks still clinging to power, sisters betrayed by false promises of reform continue their brave struggle for gender equality from below.

The transport union TSSA and the general union GMB have both been rocked by revelations of systemic misogyny, bullying, and sexual harassment over the past year. Independent reports exposed rot at the highest levels, leading to leadership changes. However, recent developments show the new leaders are failing women members yet again.

At TSSA, the workforce has declared a dispute barely three months into new General Secretary Maryam Eslamdoust’s tenure. They cite a “continuing culture of intimidation and bullying” and “corner-cutting and cronyism.” The courageous women’s group Women in Focus, which helped expose TSSA’s nefariousness, has now been derecognised in a suspicious move by the union’s Executive Committee. An “EC-organised” women’s group has emerged in its place, suspiciously populated with cronies of disgraced former GS Manuel Cortes.

Meanwhile, at GMB, little has changed despite an independent report condemning its “institutionally sexist” culture. Sisters describe the supposed reforms as “mythical,” with some areas now “much worse” for women. A shocking new report has uncovered violence, death threats, and extreme misogynistic harassment at a GMB-represented workplace. Yet the union’s knee-jerk response was defensive and dismissive, even doubting the 70+ whistleblower testimonies.

These developments confirm our worst fears: that corrupt male power networks (and their enablers) still reign supreme in key unions, blocking progress through cronyism, intimidation, and abuse. Sisters who fight back are betrayed, while new leaders pay lip service to change. Structural misogyny remains firmly entrenched.

As revolutionary Marxists, we stand unconditionally with all workers facing oppression. Capitalist bosses exploit sexist divisions to undermine solidarity, but workers’ power relies on unity. Trade unions must nurture women’s structures that can confront patriarchal power from below. Crony male bureaucrats who cling to privilege have no place in a progressive, member-led movement. Sisters deserve nothing less than full gender equality at every level of the workers’ organisation.

We applaud the brave women and whistleblowers fighting endemic abuse at TSSA and GMB. You inspire us all to keep struggling. When you fight, you are fighting for every worker. United, we can consign these rotten old boys’ clubs to the dustbin of history where they belong. An injury to one is an injury to all! Solidarity forever!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Artificial Intelligence (9) Book Review (78) Books (82) Britain (35) Capitalism (9) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) diary (11) Donald J Trump (45) Elon Musk (9) Europe (11) Film (11) France (14) History (9) Imperialism (16) Iran (10) Israel (14) Keir Starmer (10) Labour Government (25) Labour Party (9) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (13) Nigel Farage (13) Palestine (9) Protest (14) Reform UK (21) Russia (12) Suella Braverman (8) Television (9) Trade Unionism (8) Ukraine (9) United States of America (85) War (19) Work (9) Working Class (9)

One Response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A vintage revolver mounted on a plain beige wooden wall, evoking the concept of Chekhov’s gun. The weapon is displayed in profile with a dark blued metal frame and a worn wooden grip, lit softly to highlight its aged, utilitarian design.
Alexander Dugin

The Gospel of World War Three: Alexander Dugin and the Death Cult of Civilisation

Alexander Dugin’s latest polemic is not political analysis but fascist sermon—an apocalyptic blueprint in which nuclear war is both inevitable and desirable. Cloaked in the language of sovereignty and tradition, it is a call to arms for a new ideology of holy Russian power. What begins with Fordow ends with the end of humanity. And for that reason alone, it demands scrutiny—not celebration. You listening, tech bros?

Read More »
A square-cropped image featuring the bold black text "THE SAMSON OPTION" in all capital letters on a cream background. The second "O" in "OPTION" is stylised with the upper half containing the Israeli flag and the lower half the American flag, symbolising the book’s geopolitical focus
Iran

The Bomb in the Basement, the Bomb in the Mountains: Israel, Iran, and the Nuclear Hypocrisy of the West

The next state to cross the nuclear threshold won’t be doing anything new. It’ll be following the path Israel already took—building the bomb in secret, shielded by silence and strategic utility. The real precedent was set decades ago in the Negev. That’s the hypocrisy at the heart of the so-called international order: one bomb is a threat to civilisation, the other a pillar of it. This isn’t about non-proliferation. It’s about who gets to own the apocalypse.

Read More »
A stylised, screen-printed poster shows the Spanish PM in a suit walking past large NATO emblems on bold, flat panels. The image is rendered in a 1968 protest aesthetic with a grainy texture and a limited palette of red, navy blue, and beige. The composition evokes vintage political posters, with stark contrast and minimal detail emphasising the symbolism of militarism and conformity.
Donald J Trump

Only Spain Has Got It Right

At The Hague summit, NATO committed to spending 5% of GDP on defence and security by 2035—a figure with no strategic rationale and every sign of submission to Donald Trump. Only Spain said no. Pedro Sánchez broke ranks, arguing that gutting public services to fund rearmament was neither economically justifiable nor politically defensible. In doing so, he exposed what the rest of Europe won’t admit: this isn’t about defence. It’s about deference. And someone had to refuse.

Read More »