Between Militarism and Solidarity

You never know what’s behind the mask by graffit artist Hijack. Shows a child in Ukrainian colours taking a micky mouse mask off a Russian soldier.
As global tensions intensify and militarism gains momentum, how do we maintain principled opposition to war while effectively confronting authoritarian threats? Reflecting on recent debates, I explore the urgent need for genuine internationalist solidarity.

Earlier this week, in grappling with ‘The Defence Question‘, I explored the complexity (well I struggled) of developing a coherent Marxist and internationalist response to militarism and war. My central dilemma was clear: how do we uphold an uncompromising anti-war position while simultaneously recognising the genuine threat posed to the working class by reactionary forces, typified today by Putinism and Trumpism?

Since then, my reading of statements and articles from French comrades, particularly the NPA’s critique of Macron’s neoliberal militarism and Revolution Permanente’s analysis of the deepening transatlantic crisis, has sharpened these contradictions further. These interventions illustrate clearly the dangers of militarism in all its forms, even when justified in terms of democracy, liberalism, or national defence.

Macron’s recent push to boost military spending, claiming to defend European sovereignty against Putin and Trump, is exactly the type of neoliberal militarism we must resist. Keir Starmer’s Labour Party has also committed to increasing military spending, reinforcing this troubling neoliberal trend. It’s understandable why some on the left might see these stances as lesser evils, offering protection from openly reactionary alternatives. Yet, as Revolution Permanente argues, militarisation does not truly protect the working class; instead, it fuels nationalist tensions, legitimises reactionary narratives, and ultimately strengthens the authoritarian tendencies it purports to oppose.

This presents us with a profound dilemma. On one side, a consistent anti-war stance remains crucial, imperialist wars inevitably harm working-class interests. On the other, Putinism and Trumpism pose real threats, not only ideologically but materially, to the lives and democratic rights of millions.

Addressing this contradiction requires more than slogans. It demands reaffirming independent working-class politics and genuine internationalism. Opposition to war, militarism, and nationalism must remain universal and consistent, never selectively applied. The neoliberal militarism represented by Macron’s France, Trump’s America, or Starmer’s Britain should be opposed as vigorously as authoritarian nationalism.

The pressing practical question remains: how do we concretely support and defend the Ukrainian people and left-wing comrades currently under direct attack by Putin’s imperialist aggression, facing missiles, drone strikes, and military invasion? Solidarity cannot merely be symbolic. It demands concrete internationalist efforts, political, material, and humanitarian, that assist the Ukrainian working class without endorsing NATO or capitalist military agendas. At the same time, it is essential to challenge the problematic campist perspective prevalent in parts of the left, which criticises Western imperialism and NATO without equally critiquing authoritarian powers like Moscow and Beijing. Such selective anti-imperialism undermines genuine international solidarity, inadvertently strengthening reactionary regimes by failing to confront their oppressive and militaristic practices.

French comrades emphasise that genuine defence of working-class interests cannot be achieved through alliances with capitalist states or military blocs like NATO. Instead, real defence lies in transnational solidarity, anti-imperialist mobilisation, and the independent organisation of working-class movements. Only through genuine internationalism can the working class effectively resist militarism and the authoritarian forces it inevitably empowers.

While the challenges posed by ‘The Defence Question’ remain deeply complex, the answers from revolutionary internationalists—such as those articulated by the French left—point toward a principled yet nuanced position. Rejecting all capitalist militarism, neoliberal or nationalist, and reaffirming internationalist working-class solidarity emerges not just as a matter of principle but as the only viable response to the twin dangers of Putinism and Trumpism.

It goes to say: never Washington or Moscow, and come to think of it, neither London nor Paris.


Artificial Intelligence (10) Book Review (85) Books (89) Britain (50) Capitalism (9) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) Crime and Punishment (12) diary (11) Donald J Trump (56) Elon Musk (9) Europe (12) European Union (10) Fascism (10) Film (12) France (15) Gaza (14) Imperialism (22) Iran (10) Israel (17) Keir Starmer (12) Labour Government (35) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (14) Nigel Farage (17) Palestine (15) Protest (16) Reform UK (26) Russia (18) Ukraine (10) United States of America (95) War (24) Welfare (9) Work (10) Working Class (9)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

Britain

Unbinding the State: On Suella Braverman’s Plan to Leave the ECHR

Braverman’s plan to leave the ECHR isn’t legal reform, it’s preparation for rule without restraint. Like the ERG before her, she wraps authoritarian ambition in the language of sovereignty. Strip away the rhetoric and what’s left is a state unbound, a state that punishes, not protects. If she jumps to Reform UK, this plan becomes reality.

Read More »
A cracked wall bears the words “Krome Transitional Center” above a row of four old CRT televisions. The largest screen shows the hooded, outstretched figure from the Abu Ghraib torture photos, standing on a cardboard box with wires attached to his fingers. The other monitors display static. Exposed pipes run down the wall, evoking a bleak, institutional atmosphere.
ICE

Kneel and Eat: America’s War on Migrants

Reading this made me feel sick. It brought back the images from Abu Ghraib, its black hoods, outstretched arms, the grotesque theatre of domination. Only this time, it’s not Baghdad in 2003 but Miami in 2025. Don’t look away: this is what America does to the unwanted. And Britain’s not far behind.

Read More »
A vintage-style protest poster features the Palestinian flag centred on a textured beige background. Bold, black block text above the flag reads: “THIS FLAG CAN GET YOU ARRESTED*”. Beneath the flag, in smaller text, it says: “*HOWEVER GENOCIDE CAN’T”. The design uses distressed fonts and grainy textures in the style of protest posters, drawing attention to the criminalisation of Palestinian solidarity in contrast to the impunity for state violence.
Britain

Criminalising Solidarity

The Labour government has not criminalised violence, it has criminalised resistance. Holding a flag, wearing a slogan, even whispering “Palestine” is now suspect. But dropping bombs on children? That’s fine. If that sounds like justice to you, you’re already lost.

Read More »