Between Militarism and Solidarity

You never know what’s behind the mask by graffit artist Hijack. Shows a child in Ukrainian colours taking a micky mouse mask off a Russian soldier.
As global tensions intensify and militarism gains momentum, how do we maintain principled opposition to war while effectively confronting authoritarian threats? Reflecting on recent debates, I explore the urgent need for genuine internationalist solidarity.

Earlier this week, in grappling with ‘The Defence Question‘, I explored the complexity (well I struggled) of developing a coherent Marxist and internationalist response to militarism and war. My central dilemma was clear: how do we uphold an uncompromising anti-war position while simultaneously recognising the genuine threat posed to the working class by reactionary forces, typified today by Putinism and Trumpism?

Since then, my reading of statements and articles from French comrades, particularly the NPA’s critique of Macron’s neoliberal militarism and Revolution Permanente’s analysis of the deepening transatlantic crisis, has sharpened these contradictions further. These interventions illustrate clearly the dangers of militarism in all its forms, even when justified in terms of democracy, liberalism, or national defence.

Macron’s recent push to boost military spending, claiming to defend European sovereignty against Putin and Trump, is exactly the type of neoliberal militarism we must resist. Keir Starmer’s Labour Party has also committed to increasing military spending, reinforcing this troubling neoliberal trend. It’s understandable why some on the left might see these stances as lesser evils, offering protection from openly reactionary alternatives. Yet, as Revolution Permanente argues, militarisation does not truly protect the working class; instead, it fuels nationalist tensions, legitimises reactionary narratives, and ultimately strengthens the authoritarian tendencies it purports to oppose.

This presents us with a profound dilemma. On one side, a consistent anti-war stance remains crucial, imperialist wars inevitably harm working-class interests. On the other, Putinism and Trumpism pose real threats, not only ideologically but materially, to the lives and democratic rights of millions.

Addressing this contradiction requires more than slogans. It demands reaffirming independent working-class politics and genuine internationalism. Opposition to war, militarism, and nationalism must remain universal and consistent, never selectively applied. The neoliberal militarism represented by Macron’s France, Trump’s America, or Starmer’s Britain should be opposed as vigorously as authoritarian nationalism.

The pressing practical question remains: how do we concretely support and defend the Ukrainian people and left-wing comrades currently under direct attack by Putin’s imperialist aggression, facing missiles, drone strikes, and military invasion? Solidarity cannot merely be symbolic. It demands concrete internationalist efforts, political, material, and humanitarian, that assist the Ukrainian working class without endorsing NATO or capitalist military agendas. At the same time, it is essential to challenge the problematic campist perspective prevalent in parts of the left, which criticises Western imperialism and NATO without equally critiquing authoritarian powers like Moscow and Beijing. Such selective anti-imperialism undermines genuine international solidarity, inadvertently strengthening reactionary regimes by failing to confront their oppressive and militaristic practices.

French comrades emphasise that genuine defence of working-class interests cannot be achieved through alliances with capitalist states or military blocs like NATO. Instead, real defence lies in transnational solidarity, anti-imperialist mobilisation, and the independent organisation of working-class movements. Only through genuine internationalism can the working class effectively resist militarism and the authoritarian forces it inevitably empowers.

While the challenges posed by ‘The Defence Question’ remain deeply complex, the answers from revolutionary internationalists—such as those articulated by the French left—point toward a principled yet nuanced position. Rejecting all capitalist militarism, neoliberal or nationalist, and reaffirming internationalist working-class solidarity emerges not just as a matter of principle but as the only viable response to the twin dangers of Putinism and Trumpism.

It goes to say: never Washington or Moscow, and come to think of it, neither London nor Paris.


Artificial Intelligence (9) Book Review (85) Books (89) Britain (45) Capitalism (9) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) Crime and Punishment (10) diary (11) Donald J Trump (56) Europe (11) Fascism (10) Film (12) France (15) Gaza (14) Imperialism (22) Iran (10) Israel (17) Keir Starmer (12) Labour Government (35) Labour Party (9) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (14) Nigel Farage (15) Palestine (13) Protest (14) Reform UK (24) Russia (18) Television (9) Ukraine (10) United States of America (94) War (24) Welfare (9) Work (9) Working Class (9)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

Gaza

The Exhaustion of Moral Capital

Moral capital was never just sympathy, it was a strategy. It allowed Israel to present itself as victim and victor, past sufferer and present enforcer. But capital is not infinite. What was once a shield has become a smokescreen. And in Gaza, that smokescreen has lifted.

The world is watching a nuclear-backed state starve and bomb a captive population, and still we are told this is security. But what happens when the story no longer convinces? What remains when the history runs out? Only the force. Only the ruin. Only the lie that it was ever anything else.

Read More »
Donald J Trump

The Litigious President: Trump, Epstein, and the War on Journalism

The President has weaponised billion-dollar lawsuits to silence reporting, chill satire, and punish dissent. After ABC and CBS paid out millions, The Late Show with Stephen Colbert was cancelled days after mocking a Trump settlement. Now he’s suing Murdoch and the Wall Street Journal over a sketch linked to Epstein. This isn’t about truth. It’s about fear, and who’s allowed to speak.

Read More »
Britain

The Butcher’s Apron: How the Far Right Got What It Wanted

Let’s not pretend this was ever about a child proud of her nation. It’s about the adults. Their performance, their grievance, their weaponisation of the flag. The far right didn’t stumble upon this story; they engineered it. A girl in a Union Jack dress becomes a national martyr, a school is hounded into closure, and the flag flies higher because of it. This isn’t about inclusion. It’s about intimidation. Once again, they’ve made the butcher’s apron the price of admission, and Labour’s too afraid to say otherwise.

Read More »
European Union

Time to Face Facts: Bayrou, Budget Bombshells, and the Unthinkable Truth About Fortress Europe

Europe is not being overrun—it’s running out. Of workers, of births, of time. François Bayrou’s budget bombshell is less about fiscal rules than demographic reckoning. Fortress Europe clings to nostalgia while the tax base collapses. No amount of white-baby fantasies or border theatre will reverse the maths. The future demands what no mainstream party dares admit: migration, not austerity, is the condition of survival.

Read More »