Skip to content

The Tattooed Infidel at the Pentagon

Pete Hegseth’s rise to Defence Secretary marks the moment Christian nationalism stopped playing insurgent and started running the world’s most powerful war machine.

It’s not the Arabic that’s the problem. Pete Hegseth, Trump’s newly installed Defence Secretary, has the word kafir tattooed on his arm: Arabic for ‘infidel’, the term Islamists use to describe unbelievers, reclaimed by the American right as a perverse badge of honour. It’s meant to signify a spiritual and civilisational rejection, a refusal to submit. As always with the far right, the gesture is more posture than principle. Hegseth wants to be seen as a holy warrior. The trouble is that he may soon be issuing orders as one.

Hegseth’s path to the Pentagon was paved with the usual detritus of reactionary celebrity: cable news slots, a string of scandals (sexual misconduct, undisclosed donations, financial mismanagement), and an affect that toggles between genial authoritarianism and violent hyperbole. He was confirmed 51–50, with JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. This wasn’t a consensus appointment; it was a provocation. The tattoo made it clear, if it wasn’t already: American Christian nationalism is no longer an undercurrent. It is the dominant ideology of the Trump administration’s second term, now governing from the top of the chain of command.

‘Christian nationalism’ is often treated as a cultural pathology: a kind of religious cosplay indulged in by gun-toting, megachurch-attending Americans who think Jesus wrote the Constitution. But it is best understood, following William I. Robinson, as part of a broader move toward a global police state: a fusion of corporate, military, and religious power, deployed to protect the interests of a ruling class in crisis. Trumpism did not replace neoliberalism; it intensified its coercive side. When markets can no longer guarantee social peace, faith and force are brought in to do the job. Hegseth is a perfect representative of this synthesis: a man who believes the military exists to defend not just the United States, but God’s kingdom on Earth.

It’s not just Muslims who should be worried. Christian nationalism is not a politics of spirituality, it’s a politics of sovereignty. It makes exceptional claims: that the United States is chosen by God, that its power is sacred, and that its enemies (internal or external) are demonic. You do not negotiate with demons. You do not detain them. You destroy them. Under Hegseth’s watch, we can expect drone warfare to be reframed as divine retribution, aid conditional on ‘family values’, and troops deployed not to defend democracy but to shore up theocratic capital.

Beneath the tattooed bluster is a serious geopolitical problem. The Pentagon is now led by someone who sees diplomacy as weakness, pluralism as decadence, and war as spiritual cleansing. The secular liberal order—if it ever existed—is being replaced by something older and more dangerous: a sacrificial state, ruled by men who pray for the Apocalypse and have their finger on the trigger. The last time this logic was allowed to run its course, it ended in the Crusades. This time it ends in thermonuclear war.


Artificial Intelligence (9) Book Review (78) Books (82) Britain (35) Capitalism (9) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) diary (11) Donald J Trump (45) Elon Musk (9) Europe (11) Film (11) France (14) History (9) Imperialism (16) Iran (10) Israel (14) Keir Starmer (10) Labour Government (25) Labour Party (9) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (13) Nigel Farage (13) Palestine (9) Protest (14) Reform UK (21) Russia (12) Suella Braverman (8) Television (9) Trade Unionism (8) Ukraine (9) United States of America (85) War (19) Work (9) Working Class (9)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A vintage revolver mounted on a plain beige wooden wall, evoking the concept of Chekhov’s gun. The weapon is displayed in profile with a dark blued metal frame and a worn wooden grip, lit softly to highlight its aged, utilitarian design.
Alexander Dugin

The Gospel of World War Three: Alexander Dugin and the Death Cult of Civilisation

Alexander Dugin’s latest polemic is not political analysis but fascist sermon—an apocalyptic blueprint in which nuclear war is both inevitable and desirable. Cloaked in the language of sovereignty and tradition, it is a call to arms for a new ideology of holy Russian power. What begins with Fordow ends with the end of humanity. And for that reason alone, it demands scrutiny—not celebration. You listening, tech bros?

Read More »
A square-cropped image featuring the bold black text "THE SAMSON OPTION" in all capital letters on a cream background. The second "O" in "OPTION" is stylised with the upper half containing the Israeli flag and the lower half the American flag, symbolising the book’s geopolitical focus
Iran

The Bomb in the Basement, the Bomb in the Mountains: Israel, Iran, and the Nuclear Hypocrisy of the West

The next state to cross the nuclear threshold won’t be doing anything new. It’ll be following the path Israel already took—building the bomb in secret, shielded by silence and strategic utility. The real precedent was set decades ago in the Negev. That’s the hypocrisy at the heart of the so-called international order: one bomb is a threat to civilisation, the other a pillar of it. This isn’t about non-proliferation. It’s about who gets to own the apocalypse.

Read More »
A stylised, screen-printed poster shows the Spanish PM in a suit walking past large NATO emblems on bold, flat panels. The image is rendered in a 1968 protest aesthetic with a grainy texture and a limited palette of red, navy blue, and beige. The composition evokes vintage political posters, with stark contrast and minimal detail emphasising the symbolism of militarism and conformity.
Donald J Trump

Only Spain Has Got It Right

At The Hague summit, NATO committed to spending 5% of GDP on defence and security by 2035—a figure with no strategic rationale and every sign of submission to Donald Trump. Only Spain said no. Pedro Sánchez broke ranks, arguing that gutting public services to fund rearmament was neither economically justifiable nor politically defensible. In doing so, he exposed what the rest of Europe won’t admit: this isn’t about defence. It’s about deference. And someone had to refuse.

Read More »