Skip to content

The Tattooed Infidel at the Pentagon

Pete Hegseth’s rise to Defence Secretary marks the moment Christian nationalism stopped playing insurgent and started running the world’s most powerful war machine.

It’s not the Arabic that’s the problem. Pete Hegseth, Trump’s newly installed Defence Secretary, has the word kafir tattooed on his arm: Arabic for ‘infidel’, the term Islamists use to describe unbelievers, reclaimed by the American right as a perverse badge of honour. It’s meant to signify a spiritual and civilisational rejection, a refusal to submit. As always with the far right, the gesture is more posture than principle. Hegseth wants to be seen as a holy warrior. The trouble is that he may soon be issuing orders as one.

Hegseth’s path to the Pentagon was paved with the usual detritus of reactionary celebrity: cable news slots, a string of scandals (sexual misconduct, undisclosed donations, financial mismanagement), and an affect that toggles between genial authoritarianism and violent hyperbole. He was confirmed 51–50, with JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. This wasn’t a consensus appointment; it was a provocation. The tattoo made it clear, if it wasn’t already: American Christian nationalism is no longer an undercurrent. It is the dominant ideology of the Trump administration’s second term, now governing from the top of the chain of command.

‘Christian nationalism’ is often treated as a cultural pathology: a kind of religious cosplay indulged in by gun-toting, megachurch-attending Americans who think Jesus wrote the Constitution. But it is best understood, following William I. Robinson, as part of a broader move toward a global police state: a fusion of corporate, military, and religious power, deployed to protect the interests of a ruling class in crisis. Trumpism did not replace neoliberalism; it intensified its coercive side. When markets can no longer guarantee social peace, faith and force are brought in to do the job. Hegseth is a perfect representative of this synthesis: a man who believes the military exists to defend not just the United States, but God’s kingdom on Earth.

It’s not just Muslims who should be worried. Christian nationalism is not a politics of spirituality, it’s a politics of sovereignty. It makes exceptional claims: that the United States is chosen by God, that its power is sacred, and that its enemies (internal or external) are demonic. You do not negotiate with demons. You do not detain them. You destroy them. Under Hegseth’s watch, we can expect drone warfare to be reframed as divine retribution, aid conditional on ‘family values’, and troops deployed not to defend democracy but to shore up theocratic capital.

Beneath the tattooed bluster is a serious geopolitical problem. The Pentagon is now led by someone who sees diplomacy as weakness, pluralism as decadence, and war as spiritual cleansing. The secular liberal order—if it ever existed—is being replaced by something older and more dangerous: a sacrificial state, ruled by men who pray for the Apocalypse and have their finger on the trigger. The last time this logic was allowed to run its course, it ended in the Crusades. This time it ends in thermonuclear war.


Artificial Intelligence (9) Book Review (83) Books (87) Britain (40) Capitalism (9) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) Crime and Punishment (9) diary (11) Donald J Trump (47) Elon Musk (9) Europe (11) Film (12) France (14) Gaza (9) History (9) Imperialism (19) Iran (10) Israel (15) Keir Starmer (11) Labour Government (32) Labour Party (9) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (13) Nigel Farage (13) Palestine (10) Protest (14) Reform UK (22) Russia (14) Television (9) Ukraine (9) United States of America (88) War (23) Work (9) Working Class (9)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A vintage-style protest poster rendered in grainy halftone with a jaundiced beige and olive green palette. The image shows British soldiers in uniform, in a casual moment during a military inspection. Bold black text beneath reads: “SMILE FOR THE CROWN WHILE YOU OCCUPY THE STREETS.” The design evokes 1968 protest aesthetics with a stark critique of military presence and royal authority.
Imperialism

Who Is the Violence For?

This month, the British state made its position on violence unambiguous: while ex-generals and loyal newspapers led the charge, Parliament followed. The result was clear: Impunity for its own, criminalisation for its critics. In the same month it moved to quash investigations into war crimes in Northern Ireland, it voted to proscribe Palestine Action under terrorism law.

Read More »
A digital illustration features portraits of Donald Trump and Alexander Dugin side by side, rendered in bold red, orange, and black tones. Trump appears stern in a suit and tie, his expression tense, with an American flag pin on his lapel. Dugin gazes forward with a solemn intensity, his thick beard and unkempt hair highlighted by radiating orange rays behind his head, evoking a dark, iconographic halo. The background is a deep red gradient, reinforcing the dramatic and ideological tone of the piece.
Alexander Dugin

Trump, Dugin, and the Eschatology of Reaction

Trump is no longer a politician in Dugin’s hands. He is a prophet who fell short. But the prophecy lives on. That’s how Dugin works: he turns failure into myth, betrayal into destiny. Putinism becomes the sacred, Trumpism the fallen. Everything is wrapped in theology, because the politics (when you look closely) aren’t up to much. It’s not tradition he’s defending. It’s accelerationism with a whiff of incense.

Read More »
Imperialism

No One Is Above the Law—Not Even the SAS

The state demands loyalty from its killers, and contempt for those who ask why. To question the SAS is treated as heresy. To investigate them, as betrayal. But no one is above the law. Not even the men with night-vision goggles and state-sanctioned impunity. If the victims of British state violence are to be denied justice so that the myth of military virtue can remain intact, then we are not a democracy. We continue to be an empire that refuses to admit it.

Read More »