Skip to content

Blair’s ‘Climate Reset’ Is a Blueprint for Climate Defeat

Tony Blair’s so-called “reset” on climate policy is nothing more than a polished plea to preserve the capitalist system that created the crisis, sacrificing the planet to protect the profits of the few

Tony Blair’s intervention on climate change is a familiar lament: the same centrist fatalism dressed up as hard-headed realism, the same capitulation to capitalist interests framed as pragmatic policy. His call to tear down COP, abandon serious attempts at fossil fuel phase-out, and instead pursue techno-fixes like carbon capture is not a “reset” it is a white flag to capital and the fossil fuel industry.

Blair laments that voters are growing sceptical because they are asked to make “sacrifices” for minimal impact. But he refuses to confront the real reason for public cynicism: decades of political betrayal, of which he himself was a leading architect. It was Blair’s New Labour that turbocharged neoliberalism in Britain, widened inequality, hollowed out public trust, and taught citizens that politics is powerless against the market. Climate scepticism doesn’t arise from irrationality. It flows from material experience in a system Blair spent his premiership reinforcing.

“Climate scepticism doesn’t arise from irrationality—it flows from material experience in a system Blair spent his premiership reinforcing.”

His central claim. That demanding consumption limits and fossil fuel phase-outs is “doomed” is not only wrong but dangerous. It is an argument for continued extraction, continued profit, continued planetary destruction, cloaked in the language of “realism”. Fossil fuel consumption must fall, and quickly. Pretending otherwise is not pragmatism; it is surrender to the energy monopolies and billionaires already profiting from climate breakdown.

His proposed “solution” prioritising carbon capture, AI, and techno-optimism, betrays the same fantasy thinking that has plagued elite climate strategy for years: the idea that the same forces of technological innovation and market competition that created the crisis can somehow solve it, without confronting the structures of capital accumulation driving environmental collapse. Technology can assist, but it cannot substitute for radical systemic change. A decarbonisation plan based on protecting capitalism at all costs is no plan at all.

“A decarbonisation plan based on protecting capitalism at all costs is no plan at all.”

Blair’s argument is also politically bankrupt. He wants a “new coalition” of the largest countries. Meaning, of course, the imperialist core, to dictate terms to the global South. His vision abandons the multilateral principles, however imperfect, embodied in COP in favour of a new form of green colonialism, where rich nations entrench their dominance by monopolising new energy technologies while leaving the global poor to bear the brunt of climate impacts.

Ed Miliband is right to “stand firm” on net zero targets and renewables. If anything, the government should go further: nationalising energy production, massively expanding public ownership of renewables, ending fossil fuel subsidies, and investing not just in new technologies but in workers and communities to build a just transition. Climate action must be tied to class struggle, not abandoned in favour of corporate-led fantasy solutions.

The reality is simple. The climate crisis is a capitalist crisis. Blair’s “pragmatism” is simply another way of saying that capital must never be seriously threatened. If we accept his argument, the planet burns and he will write another comment piece explaining why it was inevitable.

“The climate crisis is a capitalist crisis.”


Artificial Intelligence (9) Book Review (83) Books (87) Britain (40) Capitalism (9) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) Crime and Punishment (9) diary (11) Donald J Trump (47) Elon Musk (9) Europe (11) Film (12) France (14) Gaza (9) History (9) Imperialism (18) Iran (10) Israel (15) Keir Starmer (11) Labour Government (31) Labour Party (9) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (13) Nigel Farage (13) Palestine (10) Protest (14) Reform UK (22) Russia (14) Ukraine (9) United States of America (88) War (22) Work (9) Working Class (9)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A digital illustration features portraits of Donald Trump and Alexander Dugin side by side, rendered in bold red, orange, and black tones. Trump appears stern in a suit and tie, his expression tense, with an American flag pin on his lapel. Dugin gazes forward with a solemn intensity, his thick beard and unkempt hair highlighted by radiating orange rays behind his head, evoking a dark, iconographic halo. The background is a deep red gradient, reinforcing the dramatic and ideological tone of the piece.
Alexander Dugin

Trump, Dugin, and the Eschatology of Reaction

Trump is no longer a politician in Dugin’s hands. He is a prophet who fell short. But the prophecy lives on. That’s how Dugin works: he turns failure into myth, betrayal into destiny. Putinism becomes the sacred, Trumpism the fallen. Everything is wrapped in theology, because the politics (when you look closely) aren’t up to much. It’s not tradition he’s defending. It’s accelerationism with a whiff of incense.

Read More »
Imperialism

No One Is Above the Law—Not Even the SAS

The state demands loyalty from its killers, and contempt for those who ask why. To question the SAS is treated as heresy. To investigate them, as betrayal. But no one is above the law. Not even the men with night-vision goggles and state-sanctioned impunity. If the victims of British state violence are to be denied justice so that the myth of military virtue can remain intact, then we are not a democracy. We continue to be an empire that refuses to admit it.

Read More »
A weathered and torn political poster clings to a rough concrete wall. The poster reads “SOCIALISM OR BARBARISM, 2029?” with the words “SOCIALISM” and “2029?” in bold black and “BARBARISM” in bold red. The edges of the poster are frayed and peeling, suggesting age and neglect.
Green Party

The Left Breaks Cover: Sultana, Corbyn, and the Case for a New Party — With McDonnell at the Helm?

The Labour Party under Starmer has become a machine for silencing dissent. Abbott, Shaheen, Driscoll, and others have been smeared, blocked, or expelled. The party has moved right on immigration, welfare, protest, and Palestine — and done so proudly. Sultana’s resignation wasn’t a betrayal of Labour values. It was a defence of them. And if a new left party is to be more than symbolic, it needs more than moral clarity. It needs leadership. Corbyn remains the figurehead, but John McDonnell (articulate, disciplined, and trusted) is the one who could anchor this project. He may not want the crown. But that is exactly what makes him the right person to hold it.

Read More »