Skip to content

Desert Mirage: The UAE’s Climate Contradiction

A desert oil refinery.
Amidst the shifting sands of the United Arab Emirates, a paradox unfolds as the nation's thirst for oil and gas expansion challenges its commitment to the global fight against climate change.

In the arid expanse of the United Arab Emirates, a mirage of contradiction emerges, as vast as the desert sands themselves. On the surface, the UAE projects itself as a beacon of renewable energy, yet beneath this façade, the insatiable hunger for oil and gas expansion belies its true nature. The world’s sixth-largest oil producer and the third-largest exporter of liquefied natural gas, the UAE now finds itself host to the 28th Conference of the Parties (COP28), a gathering intended to unite nations in the fight against climate change. And yet, it is here where the UAE is poised to make a mockery of the very process it claims to champion.

In the arid expanse of the United Arab Emirates, a mirage of contradiction emerges, as vast as the desert sands themselves

A Beacon of Renewable Energy, Shadowed by Fossil Fuel Ambition

In the twilight of November 2023, COP28 will convene under the auspices of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. The world will watch as representatives of 196 nations deliberate on the future of our planet, their words echoing in the vast halls built upon the sands of the desert. These countries, bound together by the fragile thread of the Paris Agreement, seek to limit the rise of global temperatures to no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

Among them, the UAE stands as one of the signatories, pledging a 23.5% reduction in its greenhouse gas emissions by 2030, compared to 2005 levels. And yet, the nation’s ambitious plans for oil and gas expansion cast a long shadow over its commitment to the Paris Agreement. The International Energy Agency warns that further investment in fossil fuels must cease if the world hopes to contain global warming within the agreed limits.

The UAE’s insatiable thirst for oil and gas expansion threatens to undermine the very essence of the gathering

COP28: Unmasking the UAE’s Greenwashing Facade

One cannot help but perceive the UAE’s actions as a travesty of the COP process, a thinly veiled attempt to promote its own interests and greenwash its image. As nations gather in the desert, seeking to forge a path towards a cleaner, greener future, the UAE’s insatiable thirst for oil and gas expansion threatens to undermine the very essence of the gathering.

The stark reality is that the UAE’s plans endanger not only the fragile balance of the COP process but also the future of our planet and the generations yet to walk upon its surface. It falls to us to confront this contradiction, to demand that the UAE abandon its reckless course and commit to a just transition to a future powered by clean, renewable energy. Only then can the mirage of progress transform into a true oasis of hope.


Artificial Intelligence Book Review Books Britain Capitalism China Class Climate Change Conservative Government Conspiracy Theories Creeping Fascism Crime and Punishment diary Donald J Trump Economics Elon Musk Europe Fascism Film France Gaza History Imperialism Iran Israel Keir Starmer Labour Government Labour Party Marxist Theory Migrants Nigel Farage Palestine Protest Reform UK Russia Suella Braverman tarrifs Television Trade Unionism Ukraine United States of America Verso Books War Work Working Class

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A vintage revolver mounted on a plain beige wooden wall, evoking the concept of Chekhov’s gun. The weapon is displayed in profile with a dark blued metal frame and a worn wooden grip, lit softly to highlight its aged, utilitarian design.
Alexander Dugin

The Gospel of World War Three: Alexander Dugin and the Death Cult of Civilisation

Alexander Dugin’s latest polemic is not political analysis but fascist sermon—an apocalyptic blueprint in which nuclear war is both inevitable and desirable. Cloaked in the language of sovereignty and tradition, it is a call to arms for a new ideology of holy Russian power. What begins with Fordow ends with the end of humanity. And for that reason alone, it demands scrutiny—not celebration. You listening, tech bros?

Read More »
A square-cropped image featuring the bold black text "THE SAMSON OPTION" in all capital letters on a cream background. The second "O" in "OPTION" is stylised with the upper half containing the Israeli flag and the lower half the American flag, symbolising the book’s geopolitical focus
Iran

The Bomb in the Basement, the Bomb in the Mountains: Israel, Iran, and the Nuclear Hypocrisy of the West

The next state to cross the nuclear threshold won’t be doing anything new. It’ll be following the path Israel already took—building the bomb in secret, shielded by silence and strategic utility. The real precedent was set decades ago in the Negev. That’s the hypocrisy at the heart of the so-called international order: one bomb is a threat to civilisation, the other a pillar of it. This isn’t about non-proliferation. It’s about who gets to own the apocalypse.

Read More »
A stylised, screen-printed poster shows the Spanish PM in a suit walking past large NATO emblems on bold, flat panels. The image is rendered in a 1968 protest aesthetic with a grainy texture and a limited palette of red, navy blue, and beige. The composition evokes vintage political posters, with stark contrast and minimal detail emphasising the symbolism of militarism and conformity.
Donald J Trump

Only Spain Has Got It Right

At The Hague summit, NATO committed to spending 5% of GDP on defence and security by 2035—a figure with no strategic rationale and every sign of submission to Donald Trump. Only Spain said no. Pedro Sánchez broke ranks, arguing that gutting public services to fund rearmament was neither economically justifiable nor politically defensible. In doing so, he exposed what the rest of Europe won’t admit: this isn’t about defence. It’s about deference. And someone had to refuse.

Read More »