Skip to content

Our Pensions, Our Planet: It’s Time to Invest in Our Shared Future

In the last quarter, Shell invested 5 times as much in fossil fuels ($3bn) and distributed 7 times ($5bn) as much to shareholders as it invested in “Renewables and Energy Solutions” ($659mn).
Our pensions should be invested to build the stable, just future we all deserve. But currently, these funds are financing the very oil and gas giants who are profiting from the destruction of our planet.

No matter where we come from or what we do, most of us want to know that the money we put away for the future is being used for good. But the reality is that the savings that many of us contribute to pensions are actually invested in expanding fossil fuel projects that put our stable future at risk.

In the last quarter, Shell invested 5 times as much in fossil fuels ($3bn) and distributed 7 times ($5bn) as much to shareholders as it invested in “Renewables and Energy Solutions” ($659mn).
In the last quarter, Shell invested 5 times as much in fossil fuels ($3 billion) and distributed 7 times as much ($5 billion) to shareholders as it invested in “Renewables and Energy Solutions” ($659 billion).

While most of us care deeply about tackling climate change, it’s likely that many are unaware that pension money is funding the very oil and gas giants profiting from the destruction of our planet. Shockingly, UK pension funds invest £88 billion in fossil fuel corporations like Shell and BP—that’s 10 times more than they put into renewable energy.

“Shockingly, UK pension funds invest £88 billion in fossil fuel corporations like Shell and BP – that’s 10 times more than they invest in renewable energy.”

This problematic investment is allowed to continue because politicians fail to implement proper safeguards to prevent our savings from causing harm. They enable pension funds to channel money to big oil corporations drilling in our seas and clearcutting ancient forests.

The truth is, keeping retirement savings tied to fossil fuels is a risky gamble. As we rapidly transition to clean energy, there’s a real chance these dirty fuel assets will be left stranded. We’ve already seen stocks tumble for firms like Shell.

We have the power to ensure our pensions build the future we hope to retire into. A first step is finding out where your pension is invested and switching providers if needed. But we also require government action to steer finance away from polluting projects that destabilise our climate and communities.

“We have the power to make sure our pensions build the future we want to retire into. But it starts with all of us demanding better.”

Taking a closer look, we see contradictions in how pensions are invested under current systems. On one hand, working people diligently pay portions of their hard-earned wages into pension funds, expecting secure returns. Yet the finance system exploits these savings to further enrich fossil fuel elites, destroying the planet for profit.

While pension funds pursue maximum returns above all, this short-term thinking erodes long-term stability. A just transition would democratise investment to better serve social needs, moving capital out of destructive industries and into renewable energy. This builds a sustainable economy where finance serves people and the planet rather than just capitalist greed.

Ultimately, tackling the climate crisis comes down to choice. We can continue lining the pockets of oil and gas giants while our communities suffer. Or we can invest in affordable renewable energy solutions that provide jobs and energy security. Our pensions ought to contribute to the development of a secure, promising future based on clean energy. But it starts with all of us demanding better.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Artificial Intelligence (9) Book Review (83) Books (87) Britain (40) Capitalism (9) Conservative Government (35) Creeping Fascism (12) Crime and Punishment (9) diary (11) Donald J Trump (47) Elon Musk (9) Europe (11) Film (12) France (14) Gaza (9) History (9) Imperialism (18) Iran (10) Israel (15) Keir Starmer (11) Labour Government (31) Labour Party (9) Marxist Theory (10) Migrants (13) Nigel Farage (13) Palestine (10) Protest (14) Reform UK (22) Russia (14) Television (9) Ukraine (9) United States of America (88) War (22) Work (9) Working Class (9)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share the Post:

Latest Posts

A digital illustration features portraits of Donald Trump and Alexander Dugin side by side, rendered in bold red, orange, and black tones. Trump appears stern in a suit and tie, his expression tense, with an American flag pin on his lapel. Dugin gazes forward with a solemn intensity, his thick beard and unkempt hair highlighted by radiating orange rays behind his head, evoking a dark, iconographic halo. The background is a deep red gradient, reinforcing the dramatic and ideological tone of the piece.
Alexander Dugin

Trump, Dugin, and the Eschatology of Reaction

Trump is no longer a politician in Dugin’s hands. He is a prophet who fell short. But the prophecy lives on. That’s how Dugin works: he turns failure into myth, betrayal into destiny. Putinism becomes the sacred, Trumpism the fallen. Everything is wrapped in theology, because the politics (when you look closely) aren’t up to much. It’s not tradition he’s defending. It’s accelerationism with a whiff of incense.

Read More »
Imperialism

No One Is Above the Law—Not Even the SAS

The state demands loyalty from its killers, and contempt for those who ask why. To question the SAS is treated as heresy. To investigate them, as betrayal. But no one is above the law. Not even the men with night-vision goggles and state-sanctioned impunity. If the victims of British state violence are to be denied justice so that the myth of military virtue can remain intact, then we are not a democracy. We continue to be an empire that refuses to admit it.

Read More »
A weathered and torn political poster clings to a rough concrete wall. The poster reads “SOCIALISM OR BARBARISM, 2029?” with the words “SOCIALISM” and “2029?” in bold black and “BARBARISM” in bold red. The edges of the poster are frayed and peeling, suggesting age and neglect.
Green Party

The Left Breaks Cover: Sultana, Corbyn, and the Case for a New Party — With McDonnell at the Helm?

The Labour Party under Starmer has become a machine for silencing dissent. Abbott, Shaheen, Driscoll, and others have been smeared, blocked, or expelled. The party has moved right on immigration, welfare, protest, and Palestine — and done so proudly. Sultana’s resignation wasn’t a betrayal of Labour values. It was a defence of them. And if a new left party is to be more than symbolic, it needs more than moral clarity. It needs leadership. Corbyn remains the figurehead, but John McDonnell (articulate, disciplined, and trusted) is the one who could anchor this project. He may not want the crown. But that is exactly what makes him the right person to hold it.

Read More »